2011 NCAAM Sweet 16

[tref]

Originally Posted by AllPurposeGamer

I think lead had a decent look but the C had the best look at the play, and they both didn't have an intentional even after getting together.

Hmmm never saw them get together... the C held up for some reason, maybe the L was the R?

Originally Posted by JRutledge

OK, but that does not mean everyone agrees with that. You can state what you would have done all day long, it was not your call or my call. Easy to sit on my couch and tell others what you would have done or who had the best angle.

Peace

Obviously...

Not saying what "I" would do. I posed 2 questions:
Are we thinking INT?
Should time & score matter?
for discussion & AS USUAL, when you dont agree you change words around &/or focus on terminology to get your point across.

Originally Posted by JRutledge

If it was so obvious, why was it not called?

Because it was too early in the game to make that the standard for INTs... time & score obviously do matter in managing a game properly.