Both blocks looked like good calls to me. Where I work, the shot in the head is a foul.

What about the illegal screen? This play seems to be *50/50 or maybe *65/35 illegal screen to no call.


*Very scientifically determined.

Looks like the right call to me. Also looks like it would have been easy to miss live.

Was asked to get this clip and get the forum's response to the call in the chat room yesterday.

<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ksxXVWWAX1c?hd=1" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" width="640"></iframe>

Agree/disagree?

It's All Academic ...
 

Easy call: Travel.

I think he traveled twice, the second of which was simultaneous with committing a player control foul.

Disagree. I see B1 establishing LGP and beating A1 to the spot during the turn, and A1's shoulder crashing into the B1's body. PC Foul.

Disregard if he traveled or not...what is your call on the block/charge call.

Bait And Switch ...
 

That will cost you extra.

I'd have a charge on the plays presented in posts 121, 123 and 139.

I thought the defender established & maintained LGP & the offense went to & through, but the calling official obviously, really liked his call :D

LOL!!!

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/dr...ated-again.jpg

This play is being referenced in another thread.

<iframe title="YouTube video player" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eQ2gM7t5wus?hd=1" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="390" width="640"></iframe>

Run of the mill shooting foul or upgrade to an intentional?

Wow, after seeing the play, it's an easy int in my games. Of course, I recognize that Rut's area probably has a different effing standard for this play.

But he doesn't even pretend to try to get the ball when he grabs the waist.

Vernon Macklin's And 1:

Definitely travelled first. And I don't think the defender did any illegal to earn a blocking call though I do think he flopped, but his flop didn't affect the shooter.