Let's say you stuck him for DoG. How would you justify it in the rules?

In reading NFHS 3-47 now I'm not sure I can give him a DOG warning.

Are you saying you would stick him for unsporting act? Or is it nothing? Wouldn't it be like a kid who dunks right after a travel call ie judgment call?

Nah, I wouldn't do either. There is a possibility of a T if his actions actually delay the game, but if they'd called this travel, they would have been looking at the monitor to determine the proper time left on the clock.

No way I'd go unsporting, either, unless he's looking at me ask for the ball and then throws it away.

On this play, it's nothing.

And if your writing in some of your previous posts in this thread had been one-tenth as clear as the above, you wouldn't have had multiple asking you what the hell you were talking about.

Already addressed by John Adams in ESPN article. Even it there had been a whistle the player thought game was over so no T for action.

It seems like you are one of the only people having a problem understanding my point on this play. Many have read and either agreed or disagreed with my point and were not trying to figure out what I was saying. Maybe your lack of understanding is and example of not understanding of the mechanics or rules very well. I do not know and will not try to guess. I think you made your mind up and you only wanted to debate why the travel was not called.

Peace

Yeah, Rut, your writing is always clear, coherent, and logically consistent.

Take it for what it's worth, but I was able to understand Rut's initial point.

I did not say it was always wonderful at all times. This is an internet forum, not a Master's Thesis or PhD Dissertation writing center. I think you made your mind up and I differing opinion was not what you wanted to hear. I also do not think you read every response from me. Do not blame that on me when you could not seem to understand others that made the same point as well. Again, there were others that debate with me and others on the points of the play, not how we wrote our responses. If you did not truly understand then you would have said what you did not understand. This is not my first rodeo here. ;)

Peace

I think the content is more important than the delivery, and that's really all that needs to be judged.

But that's just me......:)

You do rodeo, too?

I do last longer than 8 seconds. ;)

Peace

HaHa! I stand corrected!!

A positive finish for an officiating crew:

ACC officials supervisor praises Kersey, crew - Teel time - dailypress.com

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/kTMPZIGw8g4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>