The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Messy situation (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/60279-messy-situation.html)

deecee Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:46pm

ZM1283 -

The infraction IS the adding of the name. NOT entering the game. When the name IS ADDED to the book the infraction HAS OCCURED. Issue the T accordingly.

zm1283 Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins (Post 710556)
You must be reading it wrong. The answers you have been given are correct. See also 3.2.2C(a) -- it's nearly your exact play.

Looked at it.....thanks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 710557)
It has nothing to do with when the player enters the game. The player can play the whole game without penalty if no one notices and his name is never added.

Okay, I stand corrected.

Do you guys agree that we should have had a CE after it was discovered that V12 was on the roster submitted before the game?

deecee Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:59pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by zm1283 (Post 710563)
Looked at it.....thanks.



Okay, I stand corrected.

Do you guys agree that we should have had a CE after it was discovered that V12 was on the roster submitted before the game?

I will agree that before issuing the T you should have done some legwork and request the roster that the visiting team submitted and check if it were a score keeper error. That would have avoided the whole situation to begin with.

Other than that wipe out the points for the free throws as they were un-merited. I can also argue using common sense that this T can be rescinded as this T has reprucussions. The most noticeable is that it is an indirect on the coach.

You can never go wrong going with the book but I will find anyone who would disagree with the T being rescinded (except of course the opposing coach).

Mregor Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:01pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by zm1283 (Post 710563)
Do you guys agree that we should have had a CE after it was discovered that V12 was on the roster submitted before the game?

No. Under what element would you correct it? It's not an unmerited free throw. You assessed a T therefore it was merited. Your T was maybe unmeritted, but that's not a correctable error. Whether or not V12 was on the roster should have been determined before you issued the T.

just another ref Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:10pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 710564)
Other than that wipe out the points for the free throws as they were un-merited. I can also argue using common sense that this T can be rescinded as this T has repercussions. The most noticeable is that it is an indirect on the coach.

Administrative T, team T, no indirect on the coach.

Stat-Man Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:14pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by deecee (Post 710564)
Other than that wipe out the points for the free throws as they were un-merited. I can also argue using common sense that this T can be rescinded as this T has reprucussions. The most noticeable is that it is an indirect on the coach.

Are you sure about that? Technical fouls assessed under NFHS 10-1 are Team Technicals and not charged to the head coach directly or indirectly. (See also, p 70 of the 2010-11 rule book, Technical Foul Penalty summary.)

deecee Tue Dec 28, 2010 11:24pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 710570)
Administrative T, team T, no indirect on the coach.

yes my brain fart.

zm1283 Wed Dec 29, 2010 01:25am

So are these unmerited FTs or not? Can they be canceled?

just another ref Wed Dec 29, 2010 01:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by zm1283 (Post 710593)
So are these unmerited FTs or not? Can they be canceled?

They are and they can.

Adam Wed Dec 29, 2010 08:02am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mregor (Post 710565)
no. Under what element would you correct it? It's not an unmerited free throw. You assessed a t therefore it was merited. Your t was maybe unmeritted, but that's not a correctable error. Whether or not v12 was on the roster should have been determined before you issued the t.

+1

Adam Wed Dec 29, 2010 08:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by zm1283 (Post 710593)
So are these unmerited FTs or not? Can they be canceled?

Quote:

Originally Posted by just another ref (Post 710598)
They are and they can.

MRegor is right; once the FTs are shot, the T cannot be rescinded.

Camron Rust Wed Dec 29, 2010 08:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells (Post 710612)
MRegor is right; once the FTs are shot, the T cannot be rescinded.

Agree....almost. Technically, once the T is reported, it is too late. There is no mechanism for un-calling a foul that has been reported and recorded.

That said, I wouldn't criticize someone who did cancel the T in this case.

Eastshire Wed Dec 29, 2010 08:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camron Rust (Post 710616)
Agree....almost. Technically, once the T is reported, it is too late. There is no mechanism for un-calling a foul that has been reported.

That said, I wouldn't criticize someone who did cancel the T in this case.

So the line of thinking here is since the T was reported, it cannot be corrected as it is not a correctable error. The free throws then are merited as the penalty for the T and therefore cannot be canceled?

If so, it makes sense to me.

Smitty Wed Dec 29, 2010 09:12am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terrapins Fan (Post 710537)
We often take the official book to both coaches and have them approve it.

"coach is this your official roster?" they look it over and approve it or correct it before the 10 minute mark....

Here in Texas, we take the official book to each coach and have them check it and sign it under their list of players. I find it an odd practice, but do it because everyone else does it. If I am told a player from the visiting team is not in the book, I will still ask for the supplied list before assessing a T. The signature really means nothing "officially".

Welpe Wed Dec 29, 2010 09:30am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smitty (Post 710622)
Here in Texas, we take the official book to each coach and have them check it and sign it under their list of players. I find it an odd practice, but do it because everyone else does it. If I am told a player from the visiting team is not in the book, I will still ask for the supplied list before assessing a T. The signature really means nothing "officially".

We have some officials in our chapter that do that but I haven't noticed it universally being practiced around our parts. I haven't heard any formal instruction surrounding this either.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1