The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 04:15pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1 View Post
If assaulting a game official is not making "a travesty of the game", which is the grounds for forfeit, then I don't know what would be.

Game over, 100 times out of 100.
My first thought was no, you should just suspend the game at that point. My second thought however was no, Scrapper is 114% right. That act does merit a forfeit for that player's team. A mere suspension where that player's team could still win the game doesn't reflect the seriousness and severity of the act.
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 03:07pm
CLH CLH is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 293
Send a message via AIM to CLH Send a message via Yahoo to CLH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
Wow. Talk about a temper tantrum. Hopefully the official wasn't injured.

If you all don't mind, let's dissect this a bit as there is a lot going on. First there is at least a common or possibly intentional foul. Then the calling official assesses what appears to be a flagrant technical on the player. After that we have at least two more flagrant technicals on the same player.

My thoughts are we assess all fouls against the player without any indirects to the head coach and the other team is shooting at least 6 shots with the lane cleared.

What I'm wondering is if you all would consider ending the game at this point as this crew did?

It also gets me to thinking as to what I would do in this official's situation. I think he was clearly surprised but I'm not so sure I would just stand there either. Hard to say from the comfort of my computer screen.
I'm fine with the intentional on the first push, then a flagrant technical when he pushed the defender after the first whistle. It's a non-basketball play and kid obviously is an escalator and is just a big problem, dump him. I don't see the need to pile on more flagrant T's, the player is disqualified after the first one. There is no need for any indirects if you don't pile on the extras when he's already dq'd. As for ending the game, he!! nah! That punk ain't getting away with taking the game away from the rest of the players, fans, etc...get his a$$ outta there, regain your composure and play on. (assuming this was an isolated incident of course).
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 03:13pm
Archaic Power Monger
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,983
You would not issue at least one technical foul for assaulting the official? I find that to be rather interesting.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 03:19pm
CLH CLH is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 293
Send a message via AIM to CLH Send a message via Yahoo to CLH
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
You would not issue at least one technical foul for assaulting the official? I find that to be rather interesting.
I understand where you're coming from, but you've given a flagrant, he's gone. Let the law deal with him on assault, you've done what you can, you tossed him. I doubt anyone would have a problem with your technicals, but I just don't really see their point. There is nothing in high school that says you can't assess additional penalties after a player is thrown. In the NBA, you've got a flagrant 1 (basically the same as a hs intentional) on the first foul, then a flagrant T. Nothing else could be assessed after he's ejected. High school doesn't say you can't, neither does it say you should.
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 03:47pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
You would not issue at least one technical foul for assaulting the official? I find that to be rather interesting.
I would. I've issued a flagrant to an already DQ'd player before. And in this case, you wouldn't have to worry about any indirects because all the action occurred before the player could be notified he was DQd.

The more I think about this, there's no way I'd continue this game under any circumstance. There's a police report to fill out.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 16, 2010, 12:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
you wouldn't have to worry about any indirects because all the action occurred before the player could be notified he was DQd
The player becomes bench personnel when the coach is notified not when the player is notified. Also on the video it seems like the official notified the player immediately after the foul was called which caused him to attack the official.
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 03:58pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welpe View Post
You would not issue at least one technical foul for assaulting the official? I find that to be rather interesting.
Assuming for a moment that you're going to continue the game...

Would it benefit the game to assess additional Ts? I don't see how it would. Would the other team feel unfairly treated if you don't? I don't think they would. Would an indirect to the coach really be warranted, or useful? I don't think so.

What happened after the T was not only clearly outside the spirit and intent of the rules, but also outside the scope of the rules. There will be additional penalties, but they will come from authorities whose scope includes the kid's behavior.

Bottom line, IMHO if you're going to continue the game, administer what has been assessed and move on.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming

Last edited by Back In The Saddle; Tue Dec 14, 2010 at 04:24pm.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 04:30pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLH View Post
I'm fine with the intentional on the first push, then a flagrant technical when he pushed the defender after the first whistle. It's a non-basketball play and kid obviously is an escalator and is just a big problem, dump him. I don't see the need to pile on more flagrant T's, the player is disqualified after the first one. There is no need for any indirects if you don't pile on the extras when he's already dq'd. As for ending the game, he!! nah! That punk ain't getting away with taking the game away from the rest of the players, fans, etc...get his a$$ outta there, regain your composure and play on. (assuming this was an isolated incident of course).
Disagree completely. You're letting that player get away with some of his vile actions. You're not formally penalizing him in any way for assaulting an official. Having said that, there's also no need imo to pile on any FT's. Call the game, get the hell outa there before anything else happens and take the score book into the dressing room with you. Detail what happened step-by-step on the score sheet and your reasons for forfeiting. Put down the score and time of the forfeit. If the league wants to continue on with that game later, hey, that's their decision. That one has to be a discussion between them and whomever you report to. You and your partners should also put in a full written report of the incident to your association/governing body. No doubt you'll be involved with police reports also, so get some facts on paper while they're still fresh in your mind.

And ask for a police escort when you're ready to leave.

It's nice to have balls, but it's also nice to know when you should use 'em. Leave the macho stuff to the kids.

JMO.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Dec 14, 2010, 02:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Send a message via Skype™ to SRQREF
My understanding is that the kid was arrested, still learning more as this develops
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official attacked with helmet to face JugglingReferee Football 2 Thu Oct 29, 2009 04:48pm
Official gets attacked tjones1 Soccer 3 Sat Nov 12, 2005 04:13am
Official Attacked (ways to comment) w_sohl Basketball 19 Thu Jan 20, 2005 11:33am
Official Attacked Trial tmp44 Basketball 56 Thu Jan 20, 2005 09:25am
Attacked Official. JRutledge Basketball 22 Wed Jan 14, 2004 04:35pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1