Another throw-in question

[bainsey]

That reminds me of something our board's interpreter brought up recently.

Let's keep Mark's scenario, but add an A3 OOB. According to our interpreter, an OOB pass from A1 to A2 is legal, and going back to A1 is okay, but not to a third player that's also OOB on the end line.

Never have I seen such a thing, nor did I bother to look up a citation. Anyone ever hear of this?

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by bainsey

That reminds me of something our board's interpreter brought up recently.

Let's keep Mark's scenario, but add an A3 OOB. According to our interpreter, an OOB pass from A1 to A2 is legal, and going back to A1 is okay, but not to a third player that's also OOB on the end line.

Never have I seen such a thing, nor did I bother to look up a citation. Anyone ever hear of this?

Why is it illegal?

7-5-7a

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by bainsey

That reminds me of something our board's interpreter brought up recently.

Let's keep Mark's scenario, but add an A3 OOB. According to our interpreter, an OOB pass from A1 to A2 is legal, and going back to A1 is okay, but not to a third player that's also OOB on the end line.

Never have I seen such a thing, nor did I bother to look up a citation. Anyone ever hear of this?

Man, combining that with recent threads, bainsey, methinks your interpreter needs to be impeached by IAABO. He just doesn't have a clue.

Lah me.......

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Man, combining that with recent threads, bainsey, methinks your interpreter needs to be impeached by IAABO. He just doesn't have a clue.

Lah me.......

Hope not. I know the guy.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap

Hope not. I know the guy.

How did he come up with an obviously wrong answer to something that basic then?

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

How did he come up with an obviously wrong answer to something that basic then?

I don't know. This is pre-Gap.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

How did he come up with an obviously wrong answer to something that basic then?

We're assuming the case and ruling are being reported correctly. Might not be so.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by mbyron

We're assuming the case and ruling are being reported correctly. Might not be so.

I doubt very much that anyone at the IAABO national level ever issued anything like that. I know a lot of those guys. I also know quite a few local board interpreters. The great majority are very rules knowledgable imo.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

I doubt very much that anyone at the IAABO national level ever issued anything like that. I know a lot of those guys. I also know quite a few local board interpreters. The great majority are very rules knowledgable imo.

Exactly. And, I've certainly been involved when the "ruling" comes in a large meeting where the original situation mutates somewhat and someone on one seide of the room gets a ruling to the mutation that someone on the other side applies to the original question, and now there's confusion.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Your interpreter needs to be impeached by IAABO.

Not sure that's allowed under our constitution. It's fourteen pages long, so give me time to read up on this to confirm, or deny.

[bainsey]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

methinks your interpreter needs to be impeached by IAABO

You'll have to aim higher then, JR, because my interpreter got that ruling from someone on a national IAABO level.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by bainsey

You'll have to aim higher then, JR, because my interpreter got that ruling from someone on a national IAABO level.

Bainsey, I have real doubts that anyone at the national IABBO level would ever issue a completely erroneous...and stoopid...ruling like that. They are just too sharp to be doing anything like that.

[ejn1958]

Originally Posted by bainsey

That reminds me of something our board's interpreter brought up recently.

Let's keep Mark's scenario, but add an A3 OOB. According to our interpreter, an OOB pass from A1 to A2 is legal, and going back to A1 is okay, but not to a third player that's also OOB on the end line.

Never have I seen such a thing, nor did I bother to look up a citation. Anyone ever hear of this?

Your intepreter is wrong:
Rule 7-5 Art. & specifically states that ' any player may direct throw-in or he/she may pass the ball along the end line to a teammates(s) outside the boundary. " Note teamamte(s) is plural...wow..I think you need a new interprter.

[ronald]

let's see.

A says he got ruling from his guy who got it from national level

B and C and everybody else says that is wrong, can't be etc.

I say: call the national level and ask them. That is the only way to really resolve this. Now we will find out who thinks they are too good to do that. and yes it comes down to that in the end.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by ronald

let's see.

A says he got ruling from his guy who got it from national level

B and C and everybody else says that is wrong, can't be etc.

I say: call the national level and ask them. That is the only way to really resolve this. Now we will find out who thinks they are too good to do that. and yes it comes down to that in the end.

Why do you need to call anybody when you have a definitive rules citation..i.e. NFHS rule 7-5-7(a)?

Whatinthehell more could you possibly want?