What would you do?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

I follow case book play 3.3.5SitA.

But that's just me.

Btw, that case play ain't new. They just added a "COMMENT" to it to cover coaches trying to call A TO to keep the player in the game.

Doesn't that ruling contradict the illegal jewelry / headband ruling?

In both cases, the transgression can be quickly corrected with no delay. SO, why is one player directed to leave, and the other can remain?