|
|||
I don't know about the lane change, but the stated reason the NCAA moved back the three point line was to open up the area between the three point line and the paint, to encourage more play in that area, which they felt had become too congested owing to the size of today's college player. In theory, at least in the NCAA's theory, extending the three point line should result in more mid-range shots whereas before the change the vast majority of shots were taken either in the paint or at the arc. I have never heard whether the change had the desired effect.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Quote:
Eventually I'm sure we will probably see 6 personal fouls and 6 steps for travelling violations. |
|
|||
BITS Of course it had the desired afffect. The NCAA has a study to prove it. That is until they want to move the line again then they will have a study proving otherwise!!
I will say that is a big difference IMO between Men's and Women's basketball. In Men's basketball it does appear the mid range jumper is a lost art, whereas I see more of the 12 - 15' in women's games. |
|
|||
Quote:
I personally hate the rule and I don't see it going any further than the experimental stage for the NBA, but it'll be interesting to see. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FIBA front and backcourt status, and the over and back rule | JugglingReferee | Basketball | 5 | Mon Jan 19, 2009 09:53pm |
For FIBA officials (new rule) | Jay R | Basketball | 11 | Sun Nov 16, 2008 03:21pm |
FIBA Rule Interpretation | Teigan | Basketball | 12 | Fri Jul 13, 2007 07:06am |
Fed vs FIBA | JugglingReferee | Basketball | 6 | Mon Jan 15, 2007 09:46pm |
FIBA rule change | NICK | Basketball | 1 | Sat Apr 22, 2006 11:24am |