![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
![]()
After going through this season with the Boys' Shot Clock, I got to thinking what NCAA rules should the NFHS or the State Associations use/try out?
One of the things I am on the fence about is the final minute stoppage of clock after made basket, what's everyone's thoughts on this?
__________________
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates"--Earvin "Magic" Johnson |
|
|||
Quote:
I'd like if NFHS went ahead and extended the coach's box like NCAA's. In Texas we give the coach's a six-foot box and it's never really enforced unless a coach is giving an official a hard time (at least in these parts). |
|
||||
Quote:
With the last minute of play stoppage, we'd spend a lot of time fixing the clock, I fear. |
|
|||
Quote:
As far as the illegal tactics to stop the clock, it's not a big issue here really. Stopping the clock would just negate all of it. It's not really a big deal to me and as Rich said, we might have to correct the clock a bit under a minute especially at the lower levels. Heck, we see it have to be corrected still at the college level from time to time. |
|
|||
Two thirds of my games this season were the JV or freshman variety with less than respectable volunteers working the table/clock. Coaches would be watching that clock like a hawk if it was close and they were down to make sure they got every tenth of a second they could, but I like the rule.
|
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I'd like to see NFHS adopt these:
stop clock after made FG under 1:00 of 4th qtr. all players to enter lane on release of FT shot (vs wait to hit rim) Technical fouls are 2 shots and resume at POI (maintain 2 shots & ball for flagrant/dead-ball contact T's however) i'll wait a couple of years and then hope that NFHS uses a "restricted area" under the basket for block/charge plays - AND that they eliminate the airborne shooter rule in conjunction..... |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
Technical fouls are supposed to be a deterrent against unsporting conduct, especially at the high school level. That's why a loss-of-ball was included in the penalty for a "T". And it seems that it's almost an annual occurrence to have an NFHS POE issued about having incidents of unsporting conduct reduced. And yet you're proposing a rule that has a chance of promoting or increasing those incidents by reducing the penalties for them? That doesn't make sense to me, Jeff. Any coach...or player.... with half a brain is just gonna wait until his team has the ball before he goes off on us. |
|
|||
Quote:
Besides, a defender should able to defend any spot on the floor where has has LGP. If you can't obtain LGP on an airborne shooter, then the restricted area isn't necessary. |
|
|||
Quote:
As far as the restricted area goes, I wouldn't be surprised if we see it sometime in the future. The NBA has had it for a while, NCAA added it this year (I think it'll be expanded and properly marked in the future), FIBA is going to it soon (insert FIBA joke here ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FIBA,NCAA, NFHS Rules...yes but again | Teigan | Basketball | 3 | Wed Oct 11, 2006 05:33am |
NFHS vs NCAA Rules | cford | Basketball | 3 | Wed Nov 23, 2005 09:20pm |
NCAA vs. NFHS rules | LaxRef | Lacrosse | 0 | Tue Feb 01, 2005 06:19pm |
NCAA vs. NFHS rules | CecilOne | Softball | 8 | Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:23pm |
state associations | odsink | Basketball | 4 | Tue Mar 12, 2002 07:19am |