|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
NCAA Rules that NFHS or State Associations should try out?
After going through this season with the Boys' Shot Clock, I got to thinking what NCAA rules should the NFHS or the State Associations use/try out?
One of the things I am on the fence about is the final minute stoppage of clock after made basket, what's everyone's thoughts on this?
__________________
"Ask not what your teammates can do for you. Ask what you can do for your teammates"--Earvin "Magic" Johnson |
|
|||
Quote:
I'd like if NFHS went ahead and extended the coach's box like NCAA's. In Texas we give the coach's a six-foot box and it's never really enforced unless a coach is giving an official a hard time (at least in these parts). |
|
||||
Quote:
With the last minute of play stoppage, we'd spend a lot of time fixing the clock, I fear. |
|
|||
Quote:
As far as the illegal tactics to stop the clock, it's not a big issue here really. Stopping the clock would just negate all of it. It's not really a big deal to me and as Rich said, we might have to correct the clock a bit under a minute especially at the lower levels. Heck, we see it have to be corrected still at the college level from time to time. |
|
|||
Two thirds of my games this season were the JV or freshman variety with less than respectable volunteers working the table/clock. Coaches would be watching that clock like a hawk if it was close and they were down to make sure they got every tenth of a second they could, but I like the rule.
|
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I'd like to see NFHS adopt these:
stop clock after made FG under 1:00 of 4th qtr. all players to enter lane on release of FT shot (vs wait to hit rim) Technical fouls are 2 shots and resume at POI (maintain 2 shots & ball for flagrant/dead-ball contact T's however) i'll wait a couple of years and then hope that NFHS uses a "restricted area" under the basket for block/charge plays - AND that they eliminate the airborne shooter rule in conjunction..... |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
Technical fouls are supposed to be a deterrent against unsporting conduct, especially at the high school level. That's why a loss-of-ball was included in the penalty for a "T". And it seems that it's almost an annual occurrence to have an NFHS POE issued about having incidents of unsporting conduct reduced. And yet you're proposing a rule that has a chance of promoting or increasing those incidents by reducing the penalties for them? That doesn't make sense to me, Jeff. Any coach...or player.... with half a brain is just gonna wait until his team has the ball before he goes off on us. |
|
|||
Quote:
Besides, a defender should able to defend any spot on the floor where has has LGP. If you can't obtain LGP on an airborne shooter, then the restricted area isn't necessary. |
|
|||
Quote:
As far as the restricted area goes, I wouldn't be surprised if we see it sometime in the future. The NBA has had it for a while, NCAA added it this year (I think it'll be expanded and properly marked in the future), FIBA is going to it soon (insert FIBA joke here )...I'd have no problem if it were implemented at the high school level, but I'd much rather deal with implementing a shot clock first. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FIBA,NCAA, NFHS Rules...yes but again | Teigan | Basketball | 3 | Wed Oct 11, 2006 05:33am |
NFHS vs NCAA Rules | cford | Basketball | 3 | Wed Nov 23, 2005 09:20pm |
NCAA vs. NFHS rules | LaxRef | Lacrosse | 0 | Tue Feb 01, 2005 06:19pm |
NCAA vs. NFHS rules | CecilOne | Softball | 8 | Tue Mar 02, 2004 12:23pm |
state associations | odsink | Basketball | 4 | Tue Mar 12, 2002 07:19am |