Part 1 Exam.

JRutledge · #1 (**permalink**) Fri Sep 27, 2002, 01:03pm

This is an actual question.

Throw-ins.

#80--The throw-in is from the division line when A1, who is standing near A's frontcourt end line, calls a timeout when A2 is holding the ball while standing on the division line.

WHAT??!!!!!!!

Peace

ChuckElias · #2 (**permalink**) Fri Sep 27, 2002, 01:18pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
This is an actual question.

Well, it may be on the test, but it isn't a question. The test questions usually say "Official rules such-and-such. Is the official correct?" But there's no ruling in this situation. Either it's a serious misprint, or Jeff has gotten into Padgett's meds

mick · #3 (**permalink**) Fri Sep 27, 2002, 01:29pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
This is an actual question.

Throw-ins.

#80--The throw-in is from the division line when A1, who is standing near A's frontcourt end line, calls a timeout when A2 is holding the ball while standing on the division line.

WHAT??!!!!!!!

Peace

Sounds like a True statement to me.
We can't advance a ball by requesting a time-out.

Camron Rust · #4 (**permalink**) Fri Sep 27, 2002, 01:45pm

The ruling is where the throw-in is to occur after the timeout where a player near the endline requests timeout while the ball is in the possession of a teammate who is at the division line.

This is a TRUE statement.

It took me a second read...but it's not that tough.

Of course, it should be worded:

#80--A1, who is standing near A's frontcourt end line, calls a timeout when A2 is holding the ball while standing on the division line. The throw-in following the timeout is from the division line.

[Edited by Camron Rust on Sep 27th, 2002 at 05:50 PM]

A Pennsylvania Coach · #5 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 30, 2002, 12:30pm

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
This is an actual question.

Throw-ins.

#80--The throw-in is from the division line when A1, who is standing near A's frontcourt end line, calls a timeout when A2 is holding the ball while standing on the division line.

WHAT??!!!!!!!

Peace

I thought Rut's "WHAT??!!!!!!!" was because the test writer implies that A1 can call a timeout!

mick · #6 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 30, 2002, 01:43pm

Quote:

Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
This is an actual question.

Throw-ins.

#80--The throw-in is from the division line when A1, who is standing near A's frontcourt end line, calls a timeout when A2 is holding the ball while standing on the division line.

WHAT??!!!!!!!

Peace

I thought Rut's "WHAT??!!!!!!!" was because the test writer implies that A1 can call a timeout!

I think Rut is just aging.
He's having to much fun and hasn't decided to slow down yet.
I think I was around his age (32-ish) when I decided the going-up wasn't worth the coming-down.
Now I just stay up, or down.

Joel Poli · #7 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 30, 2002, 02:25pm

Is possible to get a copy of the practice test you are working on? Our season does not start until
Dec. Our IAABO board will not distribute books or refresher exams until Nov 3rd.

mick · #8 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 30, 2002, 02:48pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Joel Poli
Is possible to get a copy of the practice test you are working on? Our season does not start until
Dec. Our IAABO board will not distribute books or refresher exams until Nov 3rd.

Joel,
In lieu of a sample test you could explore the new stuff at:
http://www.nfhs.org/rules-basketball.htm#BASR

Use the new stuff in conjunction with your books, and you'll be smart enough.
mick

JRutledge · #9 (**permalink**) Mon Sep 30, 2002, 03:11pm

Quote:

Originally posted by A Pennsylvania Coach

I thought Rut's "WHAT??!!!!!!!" was because the test writer implies that A1 can call a timeout!

Actually I should have put a

next to it. I was wondering if this was a question or a statement?

Quote:

Originally posted by mick

I think Rut is just aging.
He's having to much fun and hasn't decided to slow down yet.
I think I was around his age (32-ish) when I decided the going-up wasn't worth the coming-down.
Now I just stay up, or down.

You are not far off mick.

I just turned 30 on the 22nd. I was having Football Part 2 flashbacks, with questions that did not seem to be complete. My state threw out 6 Part 2 Football questions that were written about a good as this one.

Peace

rainmaker · #10 (**permalink**) Tue Oct 01, 2002, 10:04am

Quote:

Originally posted by JRutledge
My state threw out 6 Part 2 Football questions that were written about a good as this one.

We had similar problems in volleyball -- several questions that were worded so poorly that we were simply given the answers.

stripes · #11 (**permalink**) Tue Oct 01, 2002, 10:50am

That is the problem with the NF tests. IMO, all they really test is one's ability to take their tests. Trying to decipher what they are asking can be nearly impossible.

There has to be a better way to determine an official's rule knowledge.

JRutledge · #12 (**permalink**) Tue Oct 01, 2002, 02:44pm

Quote:

Originally posted by stripes
That is the problem with the NF tests. IMO, all they really test is one's ability to take their tests. Trying to decipher what they are asking can be nearly impossible.

There has to be a better way to determine an official's rule knowledge.

I completely agree with you. These test do not really test anything other than you ability to read between the lines. They leave out words like "intentionally" or "accidentally" and make you know the exact wording of the rule to test your knowledge of the rule. Especially when the casebook and rulebooks contradict themselves at times.

Peace