Tim Higgins?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by big jake

This new NCAA super needs his head examined, Higgins is still able to call any game that is played anywhere!!!!!!

So can a lot of officials, why should Mr. Higgins get preference over the other qualified officials?

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by big jake

He is qualified and has many years of experience!!!!!!!

And??? You must be bored.

[Jurassic Referee]

Higgins is working the first NIT semi tonight.

Still a very good official imo but he does have mobility problems. He not only looks like a penguin but he's starting to run like one too. I can see where he might have a few problems in a fast-paced games.

As I said though, he can still do the job imo. And that's why he's out there tonight.

[Nevadaref]

He's had his 30+ years at the D1 level. Time to go be a conference supervisor and give someone else a chance. He would be a very valuable person at clinics, camps, and as an observer.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

He's had his 30+ years at the D1 level. Time to go be a conference supervisor and give someone else a chance.

So, if you were a conference supervisor, are you telling me you would knowingly get rid of a known commodity, a great official, simply to make a spot available on the roster to "give someone a chance"? As a supervisor, you are paid to put the best officials out there on the floor, not simply give people chances.

Now, if you break down the tapes and see because Tim is struggling to get up and down the floor, he was out of position and missed "X" calls, while the other members of his crew missed less, then now you have a legitimate reason to remove him from the staff. To simply remove him because "he's had his 30+ years" might be a way to also see you lose your job as supervisor. My guess is, even though he might be slower than before, there are other areas of the game where he still excels, such as call selection and communication, and that's why supervisors continue to use him. When the negatives outweigh the positives, then I'm sure you will see him retire. But not simply because of a number, such as age or number of years officiating.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

He would be a very valuable person at clinics, camps, and as an observer.

Isn't he already a valuable person at clinics and camps? Is being a clinician mutually exclusive to being a good D-1 official?

So, Nevada, since you've had your 10,000+ posts, isn't time you step down and give someone else a chance to be a pain in the a$$?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

So, Nevada, since you've had your 10,000+ posts, isn't time you step down and give someone else a chance to be a pain in the a$$?

Ha!

Are you volunteering? Uneasy lies the head...

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Are you volunteering? Uneasy lies the head...

Naw, M&M has already won the Lifetime Achievement Award....and retired the trophy.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Ha!

Are you volunteering? Uneasy lies the head...

See, therein lies the problem. Although I would really like to take his place, and I would really appreciate it if he stepped down based solely on his number of posts, unfortunately I just don't have the experience and knowledge he has when it comes to being the resident pain-in-the-a$$. So I am resigned to simply waiting my turn, and continuing to hone my craft until it is obvious that I am indeed better than him, rather than simply saying he is too old and it's just time to give someone else a chance.