Rule change thread - for real, this time

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

I could live with the argument that a coach should not be seatbelted after an administrative T, for example.

Huh? Presently the box isn't lost due to an administrative T.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Huh? Presently the box isn't lost due to an administrative T.

Well, crap, you're right. That's what I get for trying to hurry up and leave the office...

As I think about it, the times a coach loses the box is due to unsporting behavior of some kind. Ok, that stays...I'm actually advocating perhaps allowing a larger box, but make the coach responsible for all unsporting behavior, even on the court.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Well, crap, you're right. That's what I get for trying to hurry up and leave the office...

As I think about it, the times a coach loses the box is due to unsporting behavior of some kind. Ok, that stays...I'm actually advocating perhaps allowing a larger box, but make the coach responsible for all unsporting behavior, even on the court.

Well, actually, I don't like seat-belting the HC for a team member dunking in warm-ups. That needs to be changed to simply a direct T charged to the team member, no indirect to the HC.