The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 26, 2010, 03:05pm
rsl rsl is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 301
T or no call

Team B up by four with 20 seconds left, team A launches a three that is an air-ball, wide left by about a foot. B1, on the right side of the basket, jumps for the rebound, contacts the the net while the try is in the air and grabs long enough to move the rim.

Clearly not BI according to 6-1, 6-2, or 6-4, because the ball never made it to the basket or cylinder. But is it a technical according to 10-3-4b?

I was in the stands, but my good friend ruled no call because he thought it to be unintentional. 10-3-4b does say intentional. On the other hand, if he was going for the rebound he had no reason (other than instinct) to grab the net.

This was a HS noncompetitive rec league, but it was the championship game. I was not the ref because my son was playing and I disqualified myself. Oh yeah- my son won!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 26, 2010, 03:10pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Assuming he let go immediately, nothing.

Question, where was the ball when he grabbed the net? If it was already clear it wouldn't be successful, the try is over so 10-3-4b doesn't apply. the ball may still be in flight, but the "try" is not.

It would have to be obvious that it was intentional to even consider it. Maybe a pull-up or two.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 26, 2010, 04:30pm
rsl rsl is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 301
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Question, where was the ball when he grabbed the net?
His initial jump was timed for the rebound, so the ball was still in the air and not yet quite below rim level. If the ball had hit the rim, it may have been a candidate for BI, since it would have hit about the same time as he moved the rim.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 26, 2010, 04:32pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsl View Post
His initial jump was timed for the rebound, so the ball was still in the air and not yet quite below rim level. If the ball had hit the rim, it may have been a candidate for BI, since it would have hit about the same time as he moved the rim.
Fair enough, but unless it's obvious he did it inentionally or he gained some advantage with it, I don't think it's anything.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 26, 2010, 05:23pm
rsl rsl is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 301
Thanks. That is what I thought as well and that is what my friend called.

But, since my son's team was the benefactor of the no call, I told him I would get a second opinion.

During the game, only one fan noticed and ask me (since he knew I was a ref) so it was not too controversial.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
infeild fly, call/no call canump Softball 15 Sat Oct 18, 2008 11:49am
When the obvious call isn't the right call Don Mueller Baseball 28 Mon Aug 20, 2007 01:46am
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection DaveASA/FED Softball 28 Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm
To call or not to call foul ball DaveASA/FED Softball 11 Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call OverAndBack Basketball 36 Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1