Over the backboard shot?

[bpaulson]

Then why is it not called? Ok, we can all say that they do not call a lot of stuff in the NBA but this is one they would call.

[bas2456]

Originally Posted by bpaulson

Then why is it not called? Ok, we can all say that they do not call a lot of stuff in the NBA but this is one they would call.

Don't have an answer for ya on that one. I'm just giving my opinion on the interpretation.

[bpaulson]

To be honest, the rule is unclear in many ways. It says: Any ball that rebounds or passes directly behind the backboard, in either direction, from any point is considered out-of-bounds.

The NCAA book says passes over the backboard while the NBA rule book makes it sound like if the ball is passed behind the backboard--not necessarily over the backboard--it is out of bounds.

Yet another good reason to watch high school and college ball.

[just another ref]

Without looking.....

Doesn't the NBA rule say it can't go behind the board, as opposed to over the top of the board?

[bas2456]

Originally Posted by just another ref

Without looking.....

Doesn't the NBA rule say it can't go behind the board, as opposed to over the top of the board?

Would that make a pass from one player to another that goes along the endline illegal, since that would be behind the backboard?

[bpaulson]

Yes, my last post was a quote from the NBA book. When they say behind the backboard do they include the virtual plane to the floor and ceiling--I think not.

[APG]

From the 2009-2010 NBA Rule Book

RULE NO. 8—OUT-OF-BOUNDS AND THROW-IN
Section II—Ball
b. Any ball that rebounds or passes directly behind the backboard, in either direction, from any point is considered out-of-bounds.

NBA Casebook 2009-2010

II. BACKBOARD

6. On an unsuccessful field goal attempt, the ball hits the basket ring and rebounds over and behind the face of the backboard. The ball returns to the floor and touches inbounds without having touched any of the backboard supports. Is the ball to remain in play?

No. A violation shall be called on the last team to touch the ball before it went directly behind the backboard. The ball is awarded to the opposing team for a throw-in at the free throw line extended.
RULE 8 - SECTION II - b

7. Player A1 has control of the ball near the endline and passes the ball behind the backboard (never touching the supports) to Player A2. Is this legal or illegal?

Illegal. Same reason as #6 above.
RULE 8 - SECTION II - b

The ball is only out of bounds if it passes DIRECTLY over the backboard in either direction. Two shots by Kobe Bryant and LeBron James earlier in the season were legal because they did not pass directly over the top of the backboard but at an angle.

And looking at the play in question, that would be a legal play under NBA rules as it was not directly over the top of the backboard

[mbyron]

Notice that the NBA rule says "directly over" the backboard. IOW, only a shot taken from inside the lane and immediately behind the backboard will be disallowed.

Kobe's and LeBron's shots were legal by this rule, as they were near the edge of or outside the lane.

The NFHS rule does not employ the word "directly," and thus receives different enforcement.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by bpaulson

Then why is it not called? Ok, we can all say that they do not call a lot of stuff in the NBA but this is one they would call.

They do call it when it happens quite a few times. I have seen it called several times over the years. Of course I am sure it is missed from time to time as angles can affect an official's perspective, but yes it gets called. Then again I do not watch a lot of NBA so I have not idea.

Peace