22 years, 1 blarge

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by rwest

If the majority is wrong for inferring that the preliminary signal is "calling a foul" then you are equally wrong for conferring to determine which foul occurred first. It's not supported by rule or mechanic.

How do the two guys who both just went up with a fist arrive at just one call?

[refiator]

Originally Posted by just another ref

How do the two guys who both just went up with a fist arrive at just one call?

That is my point with the pregame, overrated or not.
I will pregame that the lead takes this call. The trail drops, lets the lead take it, and then you can discuss your differences off of the court. This can be discussed all week with differing opinions, but at least in this case the crew does not look disjointed.

[Camron Rust]

JAR, if you were even close to right, the case play in question wouldn't need to exist at all.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

JAR, if you were even close to right, the case play in question wouldn't need to exist at all.

If it does need to exist, it needs to be reworded. As is, any way you look at it, either the case itself or its perception has holes in it.

[Jurassic Referee]

Same sh!t, different day.

Saturday.

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Same sh!t, different day.

Saturday.

They have calendars in hell.