The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 19, 2010, 05:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee View Post
CaseBook Play 10.3.4COMMENT-"A player who strikes either backboard so forcefully it cannot be ignored because it is an attempt to draw attention to the player, or as a means of venting frustration may be assessed a technical foul pursuant to Rules 10-3-6."

Just saying......

From your description though, I personally don't think a "T" was warranted.
I was going to say that, if in your judgement it wasn't unsporting, than it was no different than the player hitting the floor with both hands in frustration...

but, then Mr. JR comes around with the case play comment to give you justification in your T...whew!
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 19, 2010, 06:26pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by RookieDude View Post
I was going to say that, if in your judgement it wasn't unsporting, than it was no different than the player hitting the floor with both hands in frustration...

but, then Mr. JR comes around with the case play comment to give you justification in your T...whew!
Mr. JR?

Mr. JR?

Better than your usual "hey, Dickhead", I guess.....

Note that in the case play that it says "strikes the backboard so forcefully that it cannot be ignored....". And in Snaqs' situation, he said the player tapped the board. I think that the purpose and intent of the rule is to nail the player who wants to put on a big show. I also think that most experienced officials..... like you, Snaqs(after he thought about it) and the other posters that voted for no "T".... know the difference between a kid getting a little frustrated and the showboats showboating. It's the difference between frustration and FRUSTRATION.

Technical fouls are always personally judgmental. And as you said above, if the calling official thought the act wasn't unsporting in nature, there's no justification in calling a "T".
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Throat Guard clev1967 Softball 16 Fri May 23, 2008 02:03pm
Leg guard question. Illini_Ref Baseball 1 Mon May 07, 2007 02:23am
Protective Leg Guard blueump Softball 0 Wed May 02, 2007 07:18am
HSM throat guard LLPA13UmpDan Baseball 14 Wed Mar 28, 2007 02:51pm
throat guard discussion LLPA13UmpDan Baseball 53 Sun Oct 29, 2006 04:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1