![]() |
|
|||
|
One coaches perspective
The OP sounds about right to me and should come as no surprise at all. Break down what each is doing (coach/referee) durring a game and it makes sense.
If I'm in the stands watching a game, it would be possible for me to to observe things like the officials angle, or did he referee the defense, or did he give the right signal, or did the other officials freeze after the call to watch the other players, etc, etc. But I really don't care about these things. They are all examples of things I should be paying attention to if I was there to evaluate officials. However I never have watched a game to evaluate officials. So for me to observe the officials would be like going to a concert and watching the "roadies;" or going to a stage play and watching the sound and light guys. WTF would I ever desire to do that??? I'm there to watch the "show" or in this case the athletes playing the game. When I watch a game from the stands, I watch the game, specifically the players. More specifically I rarely watch the ball, or the player with the ball. When I watch a game, I'm doing research (that's what I tell my Wife ) I'm there to study what the teams are trying to execute and maybe learn something new. Watching away from the ball makes what they are running much more clear. If I'm coaching in a game, I am certainly not watching the referee's; at least not until the whistle chirps. Nor would I want to, nor should I be observing the officials between whistles. I should be paying as much attention to the referee's angles, etc, equal to the amount that the referee's pay attention to me drawing on my dry erase board durring a time out. While the clock's running, I am watching the 10 players on the floor. During a game, my observation of a referee has to do with things like do they seem consistent in their calls, and our relationship, or "rapport." Some ref's I know I can talk to a little bit; not argue with, but ask for a clarification, or crack a joke with. If one or both are awful, (hey, it happens, some coaches are lousy too, and BOTH can continue to be lousy at lower levels) my concern is are they equally awful on both ends of the floor? While not desirable, I can accept that better than does it appear that we are getting all the calls against us (never really happens, a bad ref is bad on both ends). Do they communicate with me? I realize there's no obligation to do it, but I really appreciate a quick explanation -even while running by- when I don't know what just happened. This kind of thing does require either some pre established rapport, or real good people skills, because some referee's might just assume any question is the start of an argument. It's not. Chances are you tell me what just happened that I didn't see, and I'm going to reply, "Good call," whether it went against my team or not. Quote:
Quite frankly, after reading in here for a couple years now, I don't really believe it's appropriate for coaches to evaluate referee's. It's just as bizzare as the opposite idea. Really, what's being evaluated when I evaluate you? Personality? I don't have the knowledge or the understanding of the technical as well as mechanical expertise of your job. And I really had no idea how much I didn't know until I was exposed to you guys in here. This place ought to be mandatory reading for all coaches, and they can't post a reply for at least 1 year. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| From Ref to Evaluator | iref4him | Basketball | 22 | Thu Jan 07, 2010 09:37am |
| Coach lies to evaluator | Terrapins Fan | Basketball | 26 | Wed Feb 04, 2009 04:49pm |
| Little Perspective | APG | Basketball | 2 | Mon Jan 12, 2009 01:30am |
| A different perspective... | D-Man | Baseball | 7 | Tue Apr 11, 2006 03:37am |
| Perspective | ChrisSportsFan | Basketball | 0 | Sat Feb 12, 2005 02:10pm |