Violations/Fouls that you ignore
Just wondering what violations and fouls that we frequently ignore or overlook.
For example, after a made basket, I will frequently overlook an end line violation when the other team is quickly inbounding the ball (no defensive pressure) and their foot is slightly over the line. I'm curious about situations where common sense overrides "the book". Thoughts? |
Quote:
|
How about a player going in for a layup when they're surrounded by 2-3 defensive players by traveling?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course, in this case it may be hard to see the violation due to the amount of bodies in the area. |
Quote:
The OP is talking about obvious violations or fouls that get ignored for one reason or another. |
Quote:
The FED direction on your example above is "Whether or not there was defensive pressure or whether or not stepping on the court was inadverent, it is a violation and NO judgment is required in making the call" Iirc the NCAA issued a similar directive. |
Quote:
|
|
But to answer your OP question.
I can't think of a situation where I'd ignore a violation. Your wording is wrong. I will ignore contact in certain situations, I'm not ignoring a foul. Examples: A1 starts a drive from top of key, B1 blocks but A1 is now past the defender and has an open layup. No advantage gained. A1 is finishing a layup and is grazed on the arm by B1. If the ball goes in I ignore the contact. If it rolls out B1 gained an advantage from the contact. Fast break situation starting in BC. A1 passes the ball to a streaking A2 who has an uncontested layup. B1 fouls A1 as he's passing. If the ball reaches A2 without affecting the play, no foul. |
Given the response thus far, I doubt if there will be any further inputs to this thread.
Oh well. |
Quote:
|
I’ll ignore sliding on a poorly maintained slipper floor.
|
Try this...
We don't overlook fouls. We do not call incidental contact a foul either. That's common sense imo. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03pm. |