Throw-in spot

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by chseagle

Speaking of throw-ins, I was watching a replay of Seattle University vs. Denver University the other day. Whenever Denver was inbounding the ball it was a 2-person throw-in. 2 players out of bounds, with one OOB player passing it to the other OOB player then passing inbounds.

How often is this actually done?

It is legal following any made goal or awarded goal (The throwing team retains this right if the opponent commits a common foul or violation during the throw-in and the new spot would be along the end line.), but probably only 25% of the time will teams actually have more than one player OOB or even bother to have a single player run the end line.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

even bother to have a single player run the end line.

I have been a little surprised at the number of teams I've seen that don't seem to know that this is legal.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

but probably only 25% of the time will teams actually have more than one player OOB or even bother to have a single player run the end line.

And you almost never see a HS team have a married player run the end line.

[TimTaylor]

"Almost" only counts in horse shoes, hand grenades & atomic bombs......

[Mark Padgett]

Don't forget, if the fetus was wearing number 1/2, that would be an illegal number and you'd have a technical.

[j51969]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

Don't forget, if the fetus was wearing number 1/2, that would be an illegal number and you'd have a technical.

I missed that T

[j51969]

What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by j51969

What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

But who would shoot the free throws?

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by j51969

What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by chseagle

If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

You missed it entirely

[j51969]

Originally Posted by chseagle

If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

Whiff..whiff..whiff 3 strikes and YOUR OUT!

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by chseagle

If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

Yeah but that doesn't answer the question about who would shoot the free throws.

Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

That's OK, they can run the endline too.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by chseagle

1. If the player was pregnant, they'd most likely be in their 1st trimester only, or they didn't know they were pregnant.

2. Concerning the married player, they would of been emancipated from their parents & were allowed to marry. Also the player could be 18 & just recently married.

3. Most, if not majority of the time, on an Endline throw-in the player just stands there.

1. Not necessarily, a woman in my office was going to the gym until a week before she gave birth. Regardless, it still doesn't answer j's question.

2. It's not the impossibility that troubles us, but the rarity.

3. I don't see that often. Normally the player is at least making movements that suggest he's ready to throw the ball. The good news is he's only allowed to stand there for 5 seconds.

[chseagle]

Originally Posted by j51969

What if the player were pregnant? T for six in the game, first. A1 is fouled on a try for a goal by pregnant player B1 and B1/2. Is this a multiple foul?

If the T is before the shooting foul, any active A player can shoot the FTs. Then A1 would shoot the FT for the foul.

Did A1 make the try?

Also does the 6th player on the court for B have a legal jersey on?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by chseagle

If the T is before the shooting foul, any active A player can shoot the FTs. Then A1 would shoot the FT for the foul.

Did A1 make the try?

Also does the 6th player on the court for B have a legal jersey on?

Ummmm, the "sixth player" is the unborn child.