Throw-in spot

[buckrog64]

I was reaffirming my ruling on a rule on which I had to rule during a game i was recently in charge of the rules. Casebook 7.5.7C talks about A having the ball for a throw-in and B committing a foul near the division line, or up the court somewhere. A would then have the throw in be near where the spot of the foul occurred. I've not seen that happen but I can imagine the reaction once you start moving the ball 40 feet up the court. This happen to anyone? Did you adminster the ball in the correct place?

[BktBallRef]

[quote=buckrog64]I was reaffirming my ruling on a rule on which I had to rule during a game i was recently in charge of the rules.

Huh? You were "recently in charge of the rules?"

Casebook 7.5.7C talks about A having the ball for a throw-in and B committing a foul near the division line, or up the court somewhere. A would then have the throw in be near where the spot of the foul occurred. I've not seen that happen but I can imagine the reaction once you start moving the ball 40 feet up the court. This happen to anyone? Did you adminster the ball in the correct place?

Of course you do. Why wouldn't you?

[BillyMac]

If this were a double personal foul, I believe that the throwin would be from point of interuption. This may be confusing some people.

[Jimgolf]

Originally Posted by buckrog64

I was reaffirming my ruling on a rule on which I had to rule during a game i was recently in charge of the rules.

Does the word "repetitive" come to mind here? How about "alliterative"?

Did you misplace your thesaurus?

Or did you get a new 'R' key and you're trying to break it in?