The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 11:59am
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
I believe I read in one of our books (not handy) that if both teams are ready to play early - ball in, game on. But, if your signal 60 and one team is ready and the other not, you have to wait.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 12:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by grunewar View Post
I believe I read in one of our books (not handy) that if both teams are ready to play early - ball in, game on. But, if your signal 60 and one team is ready and the other not, you have to wait.
I agree with this. However, what was being advocated last night, was notifying the other team it was a thirty second time-out because that was what was requested, even though only full time-outs remained.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 12:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwv001 View Post
I agree with this. However, what was being advocated last night, was notifying the other team it was a thirty second time-out because that was what was requested, even though only full time-outs remained.
There's no support for doing that. If a coach is out of a certain length of timeout, he gets the other regardless of which type he requests.

If he wants to be ready to play in the 30 rather than 60, fine. But the opponent should get the entire 60 seconds if they want them.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 12:14pm
9/11 - Never Forget
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,642
Send a message via Yahoo to grunewar
Two Case Book Plays

5.11.1 SITUATION: Team A requests and is granted a 60-second time-out. After approximately 15 seconds of the time-out period has elapsed: (a) Team A comes back on the court ready to play while Team B players stay at their bench; (b) Team B is ready but Team A is not; or (c) both teams take positions and appear ready to resume play. RULING: In (a) and (b), the time-out period will continue as only one team is ready to play. In (c), the game will resume as soon as both teams are ready to play.

5.12.1 SITUATION B: The coach for Team A requests a 30-second time-out, but it is discovered that he/she does not have a 30-second time-out remaining, but does have one 60-second time-out remaining. The official grants the coach a 60-second time-out. RULING: The official was correct to grant the coach of Team A the last of his/her 60-second time-outs since the coach had already used two 60-second time-outs and two 30-second time-outs.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 12:20pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
If the coach only has 60s, he only gets 60s.
The other team is entitled, by rule, to the full 60 seconds if they want it.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 01:01pm
Aleve Titles to Others
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Westchester of the Southern Conference
Posts: 5,381
Send a message via AIM to 26 Year Gap
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
If the coach only has 60s, he only gets 60s.
The other team is entitled, by rule, to the full 60 seconds if they want it.
In the old days, the calling team could shorten the length of time by returning to the floor before the expiration of time and the non-calling team would need to be ready for play. I think that rule probably changed with the advent of the 30 second time out, but I am not sure. Stuff that happened in the intervening 26 years is a bit fuzzy to me as to WHEN it happened.
__________________
Never hit a piñata if you see hornets flying out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 06:46pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,955
Will Someone Tell Barbra To Shut Up ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap View Post
In the old days, the calling team could shorten the length of time by returning to the floor before the expiration of time and the non-calling team would need to be ready for play.
You beat me to the punch. I thought that only Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. was as "experienced" as me? Of course, I'm not as old as you guys, I started officiating when I was four years old. I only dye my hair gray to look "distinguished".
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 08:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
I ask. I used to, if a coach didn't indicate, automatically give them a 60. It's how I was taught. However, I found no support in the officials manual for doing that.
Look harder, there is rules support for this. You'll find it.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 09, 2009, 10:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by 26 Year Gap View Post
In the old days, the calling team could shorten the length of time by returning to the floor before the expiration of time and the non-calling team would need to be ready for play. I think that rule probably changed with the advent of the 30 second time out, but I am not sure. Stuff that happened in the intervening 26 years is a bit fuzzy to me as to WHEN it happened.
I know we're talking NFHS here, but FWIW that is currently still the rule in NCAA. If the calling team is ready in say 7 secs, then the table should sound the horn and team B has 15 to get ready to play on 2.

Also FWIW I've been taught at the college level - especially early- assume a 30, they will tell you otherwise. And the HS level just the opposite. Assume a 60 and they will tell you otherwise. And from experience seems to be the norm in my area.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q from 1st Year: Can a coach 'buy' a timeout? ca_rumperee Basketball 14 Thu Feb 07, 2008 01:08pm
Coach wants a timeout... DC_Ref12 Basketball 75 Tue May 29, 2007 04:06pm
Head coach ejected; timeout interp verticalStripes Football 11 Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:17am
what kind of comments/arguing from a coach constitute a technical foul? thereluctantref Basketball 49 Mon Mar 06, 2006 06:12pm
What kind of shoes? bgtg19 Basketball 6 Fri Nov 05, 2004 02:09pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1