paid evaluators

[jdw3018]

Sounds like a good process. I'm also a believer in the 1-3 type scale, rather than a 1-10 scale.

Nine areas - below, at, or above - plus your specific comments gives a lot of information. Thanks for sharing.

[amusedofficial]

I'm not a big fan of grades, since one evaluator's seven may be another's five, but a 1-2-3 based on below average, average and above average, in areas that mean something, would probably yield meaningful results, but comments should be mandatory, and evaluators should not have access to previous evaluations done by someone else, lest a comment made on an off-night become engraved in stone.

"On my ship, superior performance is standard; standard performance is substandard and substandard performance does not exist. I kid you not"

Phillip Francis Queeg prior to his retirement and second career as a girl's JV coach.