![]() |
|
|||
I understand your point, however
Quote:
So lets move on to your next argument that the committee doesn't want to restrict freedom of movement. Is this an assertion based on your interpretation or have you seen this in writing? I'm not accusing you of anything, just wanted to know where this is coming from. Regardless of its source, let's look at this argument. What you are saying is that the committee is allowing the defense to interfere with the offenses chance to score when attempting to block a shot by hitting the backboard but a similar attempt that might hit the rim or net is penalized. Also, if it is rare (as you suggest and I agree) that the ball will be on the rim, then the defender shouldn't be worried about hitting the backboard when attempting to block the shot. Since this scenario is rare, there is no restriction (or virtually none) on the defenders movement. If on the rare occasion that it is on the rim, this should be considered BI. Bottom line: You can't argue that there is restriction of movement if this scenario is rare. We are also just looking at the attempt to block a shot. Another scenario is hitting the backboard in frustration. If this should occur while the ball is on the rim, by rule we don't have BI. Logically we do, but not by rule. We just have a technical foul. I don't believe this is enough of a penalty. The basket should count.
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association Multicounty Softball Association Multicounty Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goal tending or nothing ? | mick | Basketball | 1 | Sun May 24, 2009 08:52am |
Goal Tending | scotties7125 | Basketball | 19 | Sun Jan 27, 2008 03:34pm |
goal tending | ohad_d | Basketball | 0 | Sat Jan 04, 2003 04:19pm |
goal tending | John Schaefferkoetter | Basketball | 4 | Thu Dec 19, 2002 11:45am |