![]() |
|
|||
4.22 Goal tending occurs when.....an opponent of the free thrower touches the ball outside the cylinder during a free-throw attempt.
4.20.2 A free throw starts when the ball is at the disposal of the free thrower |
|
|||
What penalty are you going to impose for the violations?
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. |
|
|||
Ooh...very interesting...
I like it - if it's the first of 2, count it, clear the lane, shoot the second, then shoot the 2 T FT's, then give A the ball back at the division line for a throw-in. To paraphrase a former poster here - That should stop the 'lil sh!ts from doing THAT again!
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() BillyMac will like that the OP could be an example of a T under 10-3-5 |
|
|||
I have no problem with omitting the goal tending, as long as you give him both free throw attempts prior to the administration of the technical.
If you take away his attempt you have to count the point as goal tending. Any objections? |
|
||||
Just to be a contrarian, how about disconcertion (a stretch, but using 2-3 here works) the first time with a threat of a T? Give the ball back to the shooter, give the delayed violation signal, and let him have two cracks at the free throw.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Player technical
a player shall not.... 10.9 Goaltend during a free throw you can debate whether or not it is a FT attempt and goaltending on the OP, however even if it isn't goal tending the act still falls under the unsporting act category and you'd have a technical. Not quite the picture I had painted in the OP but still interesting. YouTube - Goaltending A Free Throw |
|
||||
Obviously the free throw has begun, so that's not the question. I would say the free throw "attempt" has not begun, but that's an undefined word. My thought is the intent of the goal tending rule here is to prevent the defense from actually blocking the free throw shot itself.
I wouldn't really argue with someone who called it goal tending, however. I can see going any one of three ways with this. 1. GT and the requisite TF. 2. TF for unsportsmanlike behavior. 3. Disconcertion with a warning. I'd probably lean towards #2, but could see going either way depending on the situation.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Years ago in Indiana, there was a team that, if they stepped in the lane way early, would continue in the lane and actually guard the free-thrower. The thinking was, the opponent was going to be awarded another throw on a miss anyway, so let's make sure he misses. Got away with only a substitute FT penalty a few times.
As I understand it, after one or two well-placed unsportsmanlike T's later in the season, it stopped. Last edited by Jesse James; Wed Nov 18, 2009 at 12:45pm. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Force play or tag play | dsbrooks1014 | Baseball | 3 | Tue Apr 21, 2009 09:09pm |
was a force play, became a tag play ? | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 8 | Sun Aug 19, 2007 11:13am |
Play-by-Play Commentary | FC IC | Basketball | 2 | Sat Dec 21, 2002 12:28am |
CBS play-by-play announcers: should they all be fired? | David Clausi | Basketball | 6 | Mon Mar 27, 2000 11:56pm |