|
|
|
Sat Mar 07, 2009, 06:29pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Anyone See This Before?
Crush of fans breaks scorekeeper's computer, leads to scoring error in Cornell-Penn - ESPN
Apparently, the final score had to be corrected (having the computer match the book is no big deal). I was more wondering why the scorekeepers would watch video after the game was over and then change scores based on that!
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all." 
|
|
Sat Mar 07, 2009, 06:47pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Welcome newbie!
 Who know why nutty scorers do the things they do? 
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
|
|
Sat Mar 07, 2009, 07:03pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, instead of the final score being 83-58, it was 83-59? I wonder who in Vegas arranged that?
__________________
Yom HaShoah
|
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009, 12:03pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Crush of fans breaks scorekeeper's computer, leads to scoring error in Cornell-Penn - ESPN
"Scorekeepers watched video of the finish and decided a 3-pointer by Rob Belcore should have been ruled a 2, and a basket by Dan Monckton at the buzzer should have counted." That's nice, except for the fact that scorers aren't authorized to make such decisions. The value of a shot is clearly the decision of the officials on the court and if the officials gave a signal regarding the counting of the final try, then that decision has to be followed as well. Of course, I can see the scorer making a decision on the final basket if the officials just ran off to get out of the way of the onrushing students. Fortunately, the betting line was not a factor as it was 14, not 24.
Last edited by Nevadaref; Mon Mar 09, 2009 at 12:05pm.
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
