Inbounding - foul?

[Juulie Downs]

Originally Posted by deecee

Ok so dont question what you are told to do? I was just providing food for thought.

You didn't say, "let's talk to the rules committee about this" You were implying that what's said in the book doesn't seem fair, so we shouldn't call it that way. Question all you want. But that shouldn't change how you call it, until the rule is actually changed.

[deecee]

but certainly a PC foul in NEVER a play on the ball...

[Juulie Downs]

Originally Posted by deecee

but certainly a PC foul in NEVER a play on the ball...

Sooo......

[Juulie Downs]

After a lot of thought, I'm thinking maybe you mean that since it's not a play on the ball it must be intentional?? That's some kind of error in logic though I don't remember the name of it. An illegal screen isn't a play on the ball, but it's not intentional. And as you say, no PC is a play on the ball, but a PC is almost never intentional. I just don't see any rules support for calling the contact intentional if it's initiated by A1.