![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
I would disagree...just because you work 15-20 games with 3 officials on the court doesn't mean you have a enough quality officials to put 3 officials on a tournament game. How many games did you work 3-person before you thought you really had a good grasp on who the system works?
__________________
Every game is a big game
|
|
|||
|
are you saying we don't have enough "quality" officials to do 3 man for entire tournament series - even splitting half and half on 2 nights, or we don't have enough officials with 3 person training and experience? Big difference in this
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
|
|
|||
|
I think if we split it into 2 days we might have enough...what I was commenting on was if we went 3 person for the entire state for 1 year doesn't mean they will all be quality trained 3-person officials.
__________________
Every game is a big game
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Then went to Regionals and up And finally went to the entire tourney. I forget, but the process may have taken 5-7 years. |
|
|||
|
Gotcha - I agree. I don't agree with Snagwells though - what makes a first round game any less important than a final? One and done baby! 1st round games deserve the same quality as finals IMHO
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
|
|
|||
|
Some of the boys first round match-up are really tough games.
__________________
Every game is a big game
|
|
|||
|
I think the question above was whether we have enough quality officials to do 3-person, or whether we have enough quality 3-person officials to do the tournament games? IMO, right now there are not enough quality 3-person officials to handle the first round sub-regional games all on one night. Splitting them over two nights would help. But weather in Wisconsin is very unpredictable, and it would be a scheduling nightmare trying to get games in before the next round comes. Not sure of the best way to handle the 3-person dilemma, but schools are really fighting it right now, due to budget problems. Also, I think we as officials in general can take some blame, because, in some instances, we have not been able to show that 3-person crews call that much better of a game than 2-person crews. That comes from the inexperience of some, along with having to work with officials you have not worked with before. I know the theory is that in 3-person you should be able to work with any other official. But the inexperience really shows for those that do mostly 3-person games. Just my thoughts.
|
|
||||
|
I'll agree first round deserves higher quality than regular season; but I disagree that you need the same quality official on a first round playoff game as you get in the finals. Even with 2-person, you're not getting that. You just can't.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course, I believe I worked a boys game about 4 years ago where the team got its first win (0-20 up till then) in the first round. And I've had two first round boys games that came right down to the last shot. I'll never forget the one where I had my hand up as the trail on a 3 at the buzzer (2 point game) and watched as the ball rattled out. I blew my whistle and everyone (including us) stood for a second or two to absorb what had just happened. I love it when I get a first round game where the teams are close seeds playing one another. Last year, I had a boys 8/9 matchup that was outstanding and the visiting team pulled it out at the wire. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are we the "worst" refs? Family Feud says yes. | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 19 | Fri Jul 18, 2008 12:36am |
| ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |
| A scene from "A Few Good Refs" | dahoopref | Basketball | 22 | Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:18pm |
| Charles Barkley's "brutal NBA refs" comments | jeffpea | Basketball | 16 | Thu May 18, 2006 10:02am |