![]() |
|
|
|||
Finally I have seen one, first touch after....
I have often tried to envision 9-9-1 the way we have often morphed the play.
BV, I was Trail and backing up as Team A had frontcourt possession and the passed ball was loose and bouncing toward the division line. A2 touched the pass. [Ball still bouncing toward backcourt.] A2 chased down the ball to save the violation. [I'm now on the division line.] [Ball bounced in frontcourt then 12" over the division line (but did not touch backcourt).]A2, chasing the ball, reached the ball and with his right hand batted the ball toward the frontcourt, and the ball landed on barely 1/2 of the division line and bounced into the frontcourt. [Note: Defender B had slipped to the floor and was out of the action, so A2 was all alone on this play]A2's momentum toward the backcourt forced athletic A2 [never in the backcourt] to tightrope, about 6 steps, a line less than 2 " on the frontcourt side, and parallel to, the division line. Without having touched the backcourt, A2 recovered the ball. ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Or Maybe I'm Missing Something Here ???
If the ball touched the division line, then the ball gained backcourt status. If it was touched by next A2, isn't this a backcourt violation? Sounds to me like this is similar to a player dribbling close to, and parallel to, the division line, the ball strikes the division line, and the dribbler, while in the frontcourt, continues to dribble. Isn't this also a backcourt violation?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
A player shall not be the first to touch a ball after it has been in team
control in the frontcourt, if he/she or a teammate last touched or was touched by So if the ball is in control by A in the backcourt and on a pass the ball lands in the front court. The ball is then fumbled then tipped around. A is the last one to touch it and A2 recovers the ball in the bc. No violation because there hasn't been control? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
? So the control in the backcourt carries over to control in the frontcourt? I guess the whole team that had control last remains in control during a loose ball situation.
What if, instead of a pass from the backcourt it is a throw in from the end/baseline. A1 touches the pass but there is no control and the ball is bouncing around and is tipped into the frontcourt and then by team A into the backcourt. Violation there? Does team control for team A start from the throw in? |
|
|||
Quote:
The bat by A2 that hit the division line gives the ballback court status but it is not in player control so ther is no violation. once the ball bounced in the front court any player from team A could recover the ball because it now has front court status, great no call.
__________________
New and improved: if it's new it's not improved; if it's improved it's not new. |
|
|||
Quote:
I didn't make a great no-call, nor did I make a bad no-call, for that matter. ![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ref60 : 60s of Officiating : Last to Touch ... First to Touch | JugglingReferee | Basketball | 8 | Tue Dec 30, 2008 11:13pm |
First to touch | ripcord51 | Basketball | 6 | Sat Dec 16, 2006 06:25pm |
First to touch | RefTip | Basketball | 12 | Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:26am |
Touch Back or not?? | Huskerblue | Football | 9 | Fri Sep 16, 2005 03:10pm |
Can't be the first one to touch it? | dub3 | Basketball | 18 | Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:14am |