The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 768
What you think of Bobby Knight's comments about officials?

Was watching interviews the other day and caught Bobby Knight's on ESPN, they were talking about the officials, surprise. He suggested that games would be officiated a lot better if our officials were more fresh for the games. He says some guys call 5 some 6 nights a week and are worn out by this and just barely make it through some games. He said that we should limit our college games to 2 maybe 3 at most a week to have better called games. What does everyone think about that? I know it makes a lot of sense in a way, but do we have enough officials to cover so many games if we limit them to just 3 a week? probably not possible.
__________________
DETERMINATION ALL BUT ERASES THE THIN LINE BETWEEN THE IMPOSSIBLE AND THE POSSIBLE!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 11:49am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Bobby Knight doesn't think his proposals through is an idiot.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 12:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie View Post
Was watching interviews the other day and caught Bobby Knight's on ESPN, they were talking about the officials, surprise. He suggested that games would be officiated a lot better if our officials were more fresh for the games. He says some guys call 5 some 6 nights a week and are worn out by this and just barely make it through some games. He said that we should limit our college games to 2 maybe 3 at most a week to have better called games. What does everyone think about that? I know it makes a lot of sense in a way, but do we have enough officials to cover so many games if we limit them to just 3 a week? probably not possible.
Of course there are enough officials to do it. It would be one thing to do that many games in your own neck of the woods and be home every night. But these guys are flying somewhere new every day and then expecting to be fresh physically and mentally? It would be hard enough for a 30 something let alone the age a lot of these guys are. But everyone is an independent contractor and fill their calendars as they see fit. I guess the barometer is the observer's reports on their games.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 12:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
I couldn't care less what Bobby Knight thinks, says or does when he's alone in the bathroom.

I will say that the fact that one D-1 official worked a game every single day from November 14th until December 22nd is absolutely ridiculous. The human body can only do so much. Perhaps that partially explains why he's out for the rest of the year with a fractured foot.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 01:10pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by refguy View Post
But these guys are flying somewhere new every day
This may or not be true. I know that many times, they fly into a city and do two games there. For example, if you work the Big East and the Ivy League, you can fly into NYC and work St. John's one night and Columbia the next. That cuts down on the travel quite a bit. It's not always like that, and I know that you can find certain big dogs in a different town on many nights in a row. But it might not be as bad as you make it sound.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie View Post
He said that we should limit our college games to 2 maybe 3 at most a week to have better called games. What does everyone think about that?
I think it's a great idea. The NCAA can hire the officials as employees, pay them $100k+ per year, with health insurance and retirement benefits. Then they can send them where they want as often (or not) as they want.

Oh, the NCAA isn't willing to spend that kind of money on officiating? What a shock!! That means that the officials are still independent contractors and can work as many games as assignors will offer them.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:11pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by jritchie View Post
Was watching interviews the other day and caught Bobby Knight's on ESPN, they were talking about the officials, surprise. He suggested that games would be officiated a lot better if our officials were more fresh for the games. He says some guys call 5 some 6 nights a week and are worn out by this and just barely make it through some games. He said that we should limit our college games to 2 maybe 3 at most a week to have better called games. What does everyone think about that? I know it makes a lot of sense in a way, but do we have enough officials to cover so many games if we limit them to just 3 a week? probably not possible.
Officials are not responsible for assigning, supervisors and coaches often are. The supervisors might assign the games, but the coaches throw a fit if they see someone they do not like or that they feel is not "good enough." If you want to see more officials, then stop getting upset when you see a newer official or someone that you do not know very well. Case in point the game Welmer got hurt, it was clear that the Coach Izzo and Coach Self did not get on the senior of the officials about much of anything. If you do not give newer guys a chance, you will get the same officials over and over again. You are not giving the supervisors any incentive to use other officials.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 02:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Officials are not responsible for assigning, supervisors and coaches often are. The supervisors might assign the games, but the coaches throw a fit if they see someone they do not like or that they feel is not "good enough." If you want to see more officials, then stop getting upset when you see a newer official or someone that you do not know very well. Case in point the game Welmer got hurt, it was clear that the Coach Izzo and Coach Self did not get on the senior of the officials about much of anything. If you do not give newer guys a chance, you will get the same officials over and over again. You are not giving the supervisors any incentive to use other officials.

Peace
Great post. You could not have made a better post that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 04:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
The thing is when Knight was coaching, there would be officials that work 5-6 games a week work his games. At that time he could stop, it a least for himself, and his team, by tell the assignor what he wanted. And for some reason he did not stop it.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 04:32pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby View Post
The thing is when Knight was coaching, there would be officials that work 5-6 games a week work his games. At that time he could stop, it a least for himself, and his team, by tell the assignor what he wanted. And for some reason he did not stop it.
Ah, but Bobby wouldn't have wanted it that way. He would have wanted Welmer, Higgins, Hightower, et al to be on his games and not the other less important games.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 05:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
Ah, but Bobby wouldn't have wanted it that way. He would have wanted Welmer, Higgins, Hightower, et al to be on his games and not the other less important games.
Exactly!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 09:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Officials are not responsible for assigning, supervisors and coaches often are. The supervisors might assign the games, but the coaches throw a fit if they see someone they do not like or that they feel is not "good enough." If you want to see more officials, then stop getting upset when you see a newer official or someone that you do not know very well. Case in point the game Welmer got hurt, it was clear that the Coach Izzo and Coach Self did not get on the senior of the officials about much of anything. If you do not give newer guys a chance, you will get the same officials over and over again. You are not giving the supervisors any incentive to use other officials.

Peace

Agree completely. The only time this becomes an issue is when there is a controversial call and the coaches/media then complain about the number of games an official is working.

Remember Jim Bain in the 90's working two conference finals in one day (he flew his own private plane to the 2nd game) and only because he made a controversial game deciding call in the 2nd game was there an issue with it.
__________________
A Double Bonus is not really double.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SW Kansas
Posts: 728
Why is it so different for college officials? Don't NBA officials work 5-6 nights a week? Most people work 5 days a week. I don't see the point.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 09:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
How about a sliding scale based upon age? (That ought to stir the pot. )

Official's age: Max number of games per week:
20s 5
30s 4
40s 3
50s 2
60s 1
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 27, 2009, 09:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 314
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
How about a sliding scale based upon age? (That ought to stir the pot. )

Official's age: Max number of games per week:
20s 5
30s 4
40s 3
50s 2
60s 1
Here's an actual schedule this season for an official:
2009-01-26 25 0 0 Cal State Bakersfield 59 Oregon State 65 Corvallis OR
2009-01-24 33 0 0 Baylor 76 Oklahoma 95 Norman OK
2009-01-22 28 0 0 Oregon State 69 California 65 Berkeley CA
2009-01-21 37 0 0 Tulsa 75 Tulane 76 New Orleans LA
2009-01-20 38 0 0 Creighton 79 Evansville 57 Evansville IN
2009-01-17 33 2 0 Wyoming 66 Unlv 83 Las Vegas NV
2009-01-15 22 1 0 Fresno State 61 Utah State 65 Logan UT
2009-01-14 37 0 0 Southern Illinois 72 Creighton 73 Omaha NE
2009-01-13 40 0 0 Northern Iowa 58 Evansville 47 Evansville IN
2009-01-12 44 1 0 Loyola La 56 New Orleans 77 New Orleans LA
2009-01-11 32 0 0 Ucla 64 Usc 60 Los Angeles CA
2009-01-10 34 0 0 Texas El Paso 74 Southern Methodist 68 Dallas TX
2009-01-08 44 0 0 Nevada 79 New Mexico State 71 Las Cruces NM
2009-01-07 31 0 0 Southern Illinois 74 Wichita State 62 Wichita KS
2009-01-06 45 1 0 Texas El Paso 73 New Mexico 60 Albuquerque NM
2009-01-05 37 1 0 Idaho 61 Utah State 70 Logan UT
2009-01-04 43 0 0 Ucla 83 Oregon 74 Eugene OR
2009-01-03 37 2 0 Washington 68 Washington State 48 Pullman WA
2009-01-02 26 0 0 Arizona 55 California 69 Berkeley CA
2009-01-01 43 0 0 Stephen F Austin 55 Texas Tech 69 Lubbock TX
2008-12-31 43 0 0 Gonzaga 65 Utah 66 Salt Lake City UT
2008-12-30 33 0 0 Brigham Young 74 Tulsa 68 Tulsa OK
2008-12-29 43 0 0 Long Beach State 74 Oregon 86 Eugene OR
2008-12-28 37 0 0 Texas Tech 66 Stanford 111 Stanford CA
2008-12-27 39 1 0 Idaho State 63 Nevada 68 Reno NV
2008-12-23 42 0 0 New Mexico State 62 New Mexico 76 Albuquerque NM
2008-12-22 45 0 0 Oklahoma 70 Rice 58 Houston TX
2008-12-21 15 0 0 Washington State 55 Idaho 41 Moscow ID
2008-12-20 32 0 0 Arizona 64 Unlv 79 Las Vegas NV
2008-12-19 31 1 0 Prairie View Am 47 Colorado 72 Boulder CO
2008-12-18 31 0 0 Mcneese State 50 Southern Miss 69 Hattiesburg MS
2008-12-17 46 0 0 Texas Tech 78 Texas El Paso 96 El Paso TX
2008-12-16 34 0 0 Western State 73 Wyoming 100 Laramie WY
2008-12-15 40 0 0 Pepperdine 77 Usc 91 Los Angeles CA
2008-12-14 33 0 0 Stanford 74 Colorado State 63 Fort Collins CO
2008-12-13 35 1 0 Utah 52 Oklahoma 70 Norman OK
2008-12-11 42 0 0 Southern Miss 55 Kansas State 74 Kansas City
2008-12-10 45 0 0 Missouri State 67 Tulsa 70 Tulsa OK
2008-12-09 31 0 0 Drake 66 Iowa State 63 Ames IA
2008-12-08 23 0 0 Wichita State 48 Texas Christian 57 Fort Worth TX
2008-12-07 36 0 0 Cal State Northridge 67 Ucla 85 Los Angeles CA
2008-12-06 40 0 0 Baylor 58 Washington State 52 Pullman WA
2008-12-05 40 0 0 Texas Aamp M International 52 Southern Methodist 92 Dallas TX
2008-12-04 37 0 0 Usc 72 Oklahoma 73 Norman OK
2008-12-03 38 0 0 Wyoming 85 Boise State 86 Boise ID
2008-12-02 40 0 0 South Alabama 76 Southern Miss 73 Hattiesburg MS
2008-12-01 45 1 0 Kent State 60 Kansas 87 Lawrence KS
2008-11-30 42 0 0 Providence 75 Saint Marys 81 Anaheim CA
2008-11-29 54 0 0 Florida State 80 California 77 Las Vegas NV
2008-11-28 37 0 0 California 73 Unlv 55 Las Vegas NV
2008-11-27 43 0 0 Arizona State 84 Charlotte 56 Anaheim CA
2008-11-26 54 0 0 Texas State 96 Wyoming 97 Laramie WY
2008-11-25 37 0 0 Southeastern Louisiana 63 Texas Tech 74 Lubbock TX
2008-11-24 51 0 0 Unlv 80 Texas El Paso 67 El Paso TX
2008-11-23 31 0 0 Pepperdine 40 Arizona State 61 Tempe AZ
2008-11-22 32 0 0 Oregon State 71 Nevada 79 Reno NV
2008-11-21 23 0 0 Sacramento State 55 Washington State 76 Pullman WA
2008-11-20 40 0 0 Tulsa 73 Oklahoma State 91 Stillwater OK
2008-11-19 47 0 0 Nebraska 62 Texas Christian 50 Fort Worth TX
2008-11-18 36 0 0 Arizona State 59 San Diego State 52 San Diego CA
2008-11-17 28 0 0 Utah State 61 Uc Santa Barbara 59 Santa Barbara CA
2008-11-16 44 0 0 New Mexico 75 Creighton 82 Omaha NE
2008-11-15 39 0 0 Portland State 78 Rice 74 Houston TX
2008-11-14 43 0 0 Texas Southern 63 Texas El Paso 69 El Paso TX


Can he seriously be at his best all those nights in a row?
__________________
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 26, 2009, 10:11pm
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,690
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonInKansas View Post
Don't NBA officials work 5-6 nights a week?
I don't think so. I think NBA officials generally work 2 to 3 nights per week. There are 30 teams, I think. So there is a maximum of 15 games in one night. That's 45 officials, meaning that at least 18 officials are off on any given night.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bob Knight's Latest Comments about College Officials WhistlesAndStripes Basketball 81 Wed Feb 21, 2007 04:22pm
Fellow Officials At Games - Comments tw1ns Basketball 30 Wed Feb 26, 2003 11:34am
Jim Blackwood's Comments to Officials tjlow Feedback 1 Tue Feb 08, 2000 02:16pm
Jim Blackwood's Comments to Officials tjlow Basketball 0 Mon Feb 07, 2000 11:20pm
Need comments "Assaults on sport officials" msoa Basketball 0 Fri Nov 26, 1999 10:34pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1