|
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 09:36am
|
|||
|
|||
|
JV game the other night, I had a reserve player come out with "the sleeve" on. I asked him if it was for medical reasons and when he looked at me with the "dear in the headlights" look, I made him take it off. His coaches reply, "Thanks Ref."
My partner had an issue with one boys socks that game - bright orange with a gold uniform? Yuk! I told him he has no right to mess with socks. I agree though.....wait for it.
__________________
There was the person who sent ten puns to friends, with the hope that at least one of the puns would make them laugh. No pun in ten did. 
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 12:53pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Boys Varsity the other night...
Had a home player with white tights (coach actually had medical slip) and this player was wearing two white sweatbands, with nike logo, on each ankle...I guess so it would look like the tops of socks. Looked kinda funky...but, we let it go.
__________________
Dan Ivey Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA) Member since 1989 Richland, WA
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 12:59pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm not ranting, I just truly don't understand. Make them legal, and subject to the same logo and color restrictions as handbands/sweatbands.
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 08:36pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
A doctor's note does not legalize tights.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 09:08pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
3.5.6 SITUATION B: A player, for religious reasons, may not wear shorts. Would he/she be able to wear tights under the basketball uniform shorts, warmups or a skirt instead of shorts? RULING: NFHS basketball uniform rules do not require that the uniform pants be "shorts." However, undergarments or tights may not be worn which extend below the pants, therefore wearing tights “below the uniform shorts” would be illegal. The player could wear long pants or a skirt as the uniform "bottom" and be in compliance. (3-4)
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 09:41pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by Scratch85; Mon Jan 19, 2009 at 09:44pm.
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 11:17pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Tue Jan 20, 2009, 07:53am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If a girls team played in volleyball style shorts, that would be legal. Why wouldn't the same thing full-length be legal?
|
|
Tue Jan 20, 2009, 09:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
and, FWIW, I agree the rule shuld be changed. Hmmm -- girls / women sometimes wear "skorts" or "cullottes" (or something like that) -- basically "shorts" with a "skirt" overlay, but all sewn into one article of clothing. So, what if someone make "shants" or "shights"-- a similar article with shorts and pants / tights sewn together. Would that meet the definition of "pants?" I'm not sure why it wouldn't -- and since it would look the same as shorts over tights, the latter should also be allowed.
|
|
Mon Jan 19, 2009, 07:52pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I Don't Want To Know How Far They Go Up ..
Quote:
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fashion Police | Zoochy | Basketball | 50 | Tue Jan 09, 2007 08:12pm |
| Have you had to be the fashion police? | LarryS | Basketball | 32 | Thu Nov 30, 2006 01:22am |
| fashion police? | Junker | Basketball | 39 | Tue Nov 07, 2006 12:16pm |
| Question for the Fashion Police | emaxos | Softball | 16 | Thu Jul 07, 2005 06:10am |
| Socks? We don't need no stinkin socks!!!!!! | sm_bbcoach | Football | 6 | Mon Aug 30, 2004 03:54pm |
Hybrid Mode
