![]() |
|
|||
Shooting the Technical
This is Part II test question, So post at your will
Do all 9 players other than the Free Throw shooter have to be behind the Division Line? I couldn't for the life of me find the rule for this, Does anyone have the rule. This is what I allow to happen, I keep all players out of visial site of shooter, normally this is about the 28' line or where it use to be. I can't remember what I answered, figured if I only need 90% to pass, this one question among 2 or 3 others would get me a 95% so I didn't sweat being wrng or right but Well now I want to know, so that it is forever writen in stone in my mind.
__________________
Jess After all that is said and done, more is said than done |
|
|||
I agree this has been a popular question. Maybe it is easier to grasp if you think of why the lane spaces are not occupied during an intentional or technical FT. They are not occupied because the ball will not remain live after a missed FT and there is no need for rebounders. The ball will be put in play at the spot nearest the violation or at the division line when the FT's have ended.
It has nothing to do with giving the FT shooter an added advantage or the offending Team an added penalty. Last edited by Scratch85; Fri Dec 12, 2008 at 03:12pm. |
|
|||
I guess the fact that I couldn't find any mention of the applying specifics for a Techincal foul, one would conclude that normal free throw mechanics apply.
Sometime I wish it would just spell out things/rules or non-rules. I guess we as officials have applied our own interurps, that they have spread to others.
__________________
Jess After all that is said and done, more is said than done |
|
|||
![]()
More widespread than "over the back"?
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association Multicounty Softball Association Multicounty Basketball Officials Association |
|
||||
Yes, and more widespread than "reaching" and the throwin travel. Everyone thinks they have to move back. I had a kid the other night on an intentional free throw walk up to the 3 pt line. His coach said something to him, then he walked back behind the division line.
I think more officials will require this of the players than will call "over the back" when there's no contact.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association Multicounty Softball Association Multicounty Basketball Officials Association |
|
||||
Quote:
BTW, that same guy comes to my games in Colorado. He brings his sister, though, and she's always counting to 3.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Well yes, but....
Quote:
Also, I get the three second call too. I even once got it while I was administering a throw in on the end line and the ball hadn't been released yet! Boy, these fans sure do get around. They come to your games and mine! Love to have their air miles. Next time their at one of my games, I'll tell them that your having a game too and that you miss them!
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association Multicounty Softball Association Multicounty Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
I Say No, But I'm Just The Keeper Of The List ...
Third thread in less than a week regarding this issue. Is this a job for the Mythbusters?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Double Technical after Shooting Foul | scboa11 | Basketball | 2 | Sat Feb 09, 2008 01:36pm |
Shooting Foul with Technical Foul / How Many FTs? | rgncjn | Basketball | 5 | Mon Jan 08, 2007 03:29am |
Shooting Foul & Technical - Free Throw Shooting? | brightstripes54 | Basketball | 10 | Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:56pm |
[NF] Technical & personal "shooting" foul administration | LukeZ | Basketball | 4 | Tue Dec 02, 2003 06:23am |
Technical foul during free throw shooting | bluehen | Basketball | 2 | Wed Mar 22, 2000 11:02am |