LGP Under the Basket?

[Coach Bill]

In OP, it says he released the shot and then charged. Does the basket count?

[Grail]

Originally Posted by Coach Bill

In OP, it says he released the shot and then charged. Does the basket count?

Not under Fed rules.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Coach Bill

In OP, it says he released the shot and then charged. Does the basket count?

If the shooter is still airborne when he charges into the defender, then it's a player control foul, wipe the basket.

If the shooter has landed before he charges into the defender, then at most it's a common foul, count the basket and possibly shoot bonus. More likely however, the ball has already passed through the basket and is dead, unless the foul is deemed intentional or flagrant, it is ignored.

[jritchie]

Originally Posted by Coach Bill

In OP, it says he released the shot and then charged. Does the basket count?

In CCA-men, if the ball is released and player has not come back to the floor before the crash, the basket does count!

[OHBBREF]

Originally Posted by jritchie

In CCA-men, if the ball is released and player has not come back to the floor before the crash, the basket does count!

NCAA - Men No airborne shooter

FED - NCAA-Women Airborne Shooter exisits so this tends to be more common call however last year NCAAW specificall edited the rule book to remove the codicile that a player under the basket could only be charged with a blocking foul in such a situation.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by OHBBREF

NCAA - Men No airborne shooter

This is a myth propagated by the NFHS and NCAA themselves, in the chart of differences between the two rulesets. There is an airborne shooter rule in NCAAM -- Rule 4-1, the very first definition.

The difference is that a common foul committed by an airborne shooter is not a player control foul under NCAAM rules.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

This is a myth propagated by the NFHS and NCAA themselves, in the chart of differences between the two rulesets. There is an airborne shooter rule in NCAAM -- Rule 4-1, the very first definition.

The difference is that a common foul committed by an airborne shooter is not a player control foul under NCAAM rules.

So...is the end result any different then from the myth?

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

So...is the end result any different then from the myth?

Well, if there was no airborne shooter, then B1 could foul A1 after the shot is released, and before A1 lands, and it would have to be considered a common foul, not a shooting foul. But, because A1 is still an airborne shooter, they would still shoot FT(s).

Do I have that right, Scrappy?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Do I have that right, Scrappy?

Seems right to me.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Well, if there was no airborne shooter, then B1 could foul A1 after the shot is released, and before A1 lands, and it would have to be considered a common foul, not a shooting foul. But, because A1 is still an airborne shooter, they would still shoot FT(s).

Do I have that right, Scrappy?

What if the foul was "on the floor?"

[OHBBREF]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

The difference is that a common foul committed by an airborne shooter is not a player control foul under NCAAM rules.

much better description.