Q14 - unclear situation

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by chartrusepengui

Is false your answer - or NFHS answer?
I think the answer is True - but books are in car and it's raining hard right now.

Why true?

[jritchie]

false, 4.36.2.b long discussion on this already!!!

[Spence]

To summarize:

If the ball has not been touched/the throw in has not ended, its POI.
If the ball has been touched but no control established, its AP.

Correct?

[jdw3018]

Originally Posted by Spence

To summarize:

If the ball has not been touched/the throw in has not ended, its POI.
If the ball has been touched but no control established, its AP.

Correct?

Argh. Sorry for the frustration, but this is a fundamental piece that's being missed over and over:

Play after a double foul is always resumed by employing POI. It's just that in this case, where the point of interruption is is determined by whether the throw-in has ended or not.

If the ball hasn't been touched, then the POI is the throw-in. Therefore, play was interrupted during a throw-in, and the team entitled to that throw-in is given another throw-in to resume play.

If teh ball has been touched, then the POI is a live ball in play with no team control. Therefore, play was interrupted during a live ball with no team control, and an A/P throw-in is awarded to the team that has the arrow.

Again, fundamentally, POI is always used in this scenario. What an official must do in this case is determine what the point of interruption is...

[just another ref]

Another example of a poorly worded question. Since they don't say the ball was touched inbounds we must assume that it wasn't.............or since they state that neither team has gained control, does that infer that it was touched?
Not enough information to answer.

[tjones1]

While I agree there isn't enough information to answer the question, I believe what they are trying to get at is the throw-in hasn't ended. Therefore, false.

[Kelvin green]

Originally Posted by jritchie

false, 4.36.2.b long discussion on this already!!!

FYI...

when quoting the rules you use dashes 4-36-2b... when you use dots it is for casebook plays...

POI is correct here since the rule specifically tells you to redo the throw-in...