64. After Goaltending, throw in?

[jritchie]

After B1 goaltends, A1 gets a throw in on baseline, They would be allowed to run the baseline or would it be a spot throw in?

We counted the basket, so they should get to run the baseline, correct?

[iref4him]

B1 Goaltends at A's basket. Count the basket. Team B's throw-in from anywhere behind the endline.

B1 goaltends at B's Basket (why..maybe he thought it was a pass). No points scored. Team A's thrown in closest to the violation. Spot throw in.

[jritchie]

So you are going to call goaltending on B1 at B's basket, when he grabs a shot that everyone may know is going in and jams it through?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by jritchie

So you are going to call goaltending on B1 at B's basket, when he grabs a shot that everyone may know is going in and jams it through?

Yes.

[iref4him]

I was being trying to be sarcastic...WHy would someone goaltend there own teammates shot. But, I have seen officials call it goaltending and then others a pass. This is a good pre-game item.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by iref4him

I was being trying to be sarcastic...WHy would someone goaltend there own teammates shot. But, I have seen officials call it goaltending and then others a pass. This is a good pre-game item.

That's because goaltending can only be on a try. If you judge the "throw" from A1 to be a try, then the possibility of goaltending exists. If you judge the throw from A1 to be a pass, then there cannot be goaltending (but there still could be BI).

[iref4him]

I don't disagree with you..I have just seen called both ways. Like you said, it depends on whether you judge it to be a pass or a try.

[rfp]

Goaltending on an offensive player? Not only have I never ever seen that called, I'm having a hard time imagining the situation where I would call it. I think you're going to have an impossible job of making the case that you could read a player's mind to conclude this was a shot and not a pass.

Has anyone ever seen this called?

[Adam]

Yes, I have.

Wait, that ball was in the cylinder so it was BI.

[rfp]

Sure, offensive BI is not terribly uncommon. It's offensive goaltending I'm having a hard time envisioning...

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by jritchie

We counted the basket, so they should get to run the baseline, correct?

Technically, we DON'T count the basket, do we? Isn't the ball dead when the violation is committed, and then we "award" points for the basket? And then the rule book says the in-bounding player can run the end line after a "made or awarded basket". Isn't that right?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Technically, we DON'T count the basket, do we? Isn't the ball dead when the violation is committed, and then we "award" points for the basket? And then the rule book says the in-bounding player can run the end line after a "made or awarded basket". Isn't that right?

We have a winner!

NFHS 7-5-7: A throw-in anywhere along the end line after a goal or an awarded goal for basket interference or goaltending by a defensive player, as in 9-12 Penalty 1, the team not credited with the score shall make a throw-in from the end of the court where the goal was made and from any point outside the end line.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by rainmaker

Technically, we DON'T count the basket, do we? Isn't the ball dead when the violation is committed, and then we "award" points for the basket? And then the rule book says the in-bounding player can run the end line after a "made or awarded basket". Isn't that right?

ALERT! ALERT!

JUULIE'S BACK!!!!!!!!!

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by rfp

Sure, offensive BI is not terribly uncommon. It's offensive goaltending I'm having a hard time envisioning...

Wasn't offensive goaltending originally one of the "Wilt Chamberlain Rules?" If I recall the story, when Chamberlain was in Kansas, his teammates felt free to throw up shots knowing that Wilt was around to guide then into the basket when needed. The rule was passed which made it illegal to touch the ball on its downward flight. Also, this was when the lane was widened, if I am not mistaken. If I am mistaken, JR will likely be resurrected and point out my mistake(s).

[truerookie]

Originally Posted by just another ref

If I am mistaken, JR will likely be resurrected and point out my mistake(s).

I don't expect that to happen anytime soon!