The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 242
Bench Personnel?

During a timeout by Team A, A6, A7 and A8 report to the scorers table to check into the game and return to A's huddle. Team B breaks their huddle and takes the floor. As B1 is walking past A's huddle towards the throw-in spot, he taunts A1 and the two begin fighting. Eventually, B1, B2, B3 and A1, A2 and A6 fight.

Assess penalties.

My biggest question is: how do officials determine who are players for A and who are bench personell? (A1-A8 can't all be considered players, can they?)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 10:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by sseltser View Post
During a timeout by Team A, A6, A7 and A8 report to the scorers table to check into the game and return to A's huddle. Team B breaks their huddle and takes the floor. As B1 is walking past A's huddle towards the throw-in spot, he taunts A1 and the two begin fighting. Eventually, B1, B2, B3 and A1, A2 and A6 fight.

Assess penalties.

My biggest question is: how do officials determine who are players for A and who are bench personell? (A1-A8 can't all be considered players, can they?)
If you don't know who is a player and who is bench personnel, assume that they were bench personnel -- this results in the maximum penalty to the coach.

See 3.3.1E
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
The subs had checked in and replaced the other players. The 5 players in the game (now A1 A2 A6 A7 A8) are not considered bench personnell during a timeout. If this happened during an intermission, all players are bench personell. You eject A1 and B1 immediately and then eject the other 4 for fighting. A6 is now a player and not considered bench personnel b/c this was during a timeout so no penalty on the HC.

Last edited by JS 20; Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 11:47am.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS 20 View Post
The subs had checked in and replaced the other players. The 5 players in the game (now A1 A2 A6 A7 A8) are not considered bench personnell during a timeout. If this happened during an intermission, all players are bench personell. You eject A1 and B1 immediately and then eject the other 4 for fighting. A6 is now a player and not considered bench personnel b/c this was during a timeout so no penalty on the HC.
How do you know A6, A7, A8 went in for A3, A4 and A5?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
How do you know A6, A7, A8 went in for A3, A4 and A5?
sseltser said in his original post that they reported to check in and then returned to the huddle. He didn't mention them not doing so before the warning horn so I think it's safe to assume they checked in for A3 A4 A5 or A# whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 11:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
But that's the point...you know they checked in, but not for whom they checked in. So, when A1 and A2 participate in the fight are they players or bench personnel?

If A7 checked in for A1, then A1 should be considered bench personnel for purposes of indirect technical fouls on the coach. The question being posed by the OP is how, or whether to try, to determine this.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
You can always ask the official scorekeeper to see if they know. If they have no definitive knowledge - you are no worse off.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
But that's the point...you know they checked in, but not for whom they checked in. So, when A1 and A2 participate in the fight are they players or bench personnel?

If A7 checked in for A1, then A1 should be considered bench personnel for purposes of indirect technical fouls on the coach. The question being posed by the OP is how, or whether to try, to determine this.
Well then the OP should come back and be more specific.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS 20 View Post
Well then the OP should come back and be more specific.
How should he be more specific? It's obvious what he's asking, why it matters, and what the challenge is.

I don't have a good answer for him, but it's an excellent question.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:19pm
Ch1town
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When a team member checks in during a TO & then returns to the huddle, are they not still bench personnel until the TO is over?
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
How should he be more specific? It's obvious what he's asking, why it matters, and what the challenge is.

I don't have a good answer for him, but it's an excellent question.
Ok now I get it.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 12:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch1town View Post
When a team member checks in during a TO & then returns to the huddle, are they not still bench personnel until the TO is over?
Hmmm...are they? I don't have my book at the moment. This is one I definitely should know, but I'm not sure.

Now that I think about it, you may very well be right, and that's going to make this situation a whole lot easier...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 01:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 195
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018 View Post
Hmmm...are they? I don't have my book at the moment. This is one I definitely should know, but I'm not sure.

Now that I think about it, you may very well be right, and that's going to make this situation a whole lot easier...
I looked through the book and couldn't find anything specific enough to cite on this.

However, I would say they're in the game and now considered players. My logic behind that is, let's say A6 goes and checks in for A1. A1 can't go out on the court after the TO is over b/c he/she was replaced and can't reenter until the clock has started. So I'd say you have to consider the subs players and the players who were replaced are now bench personnel.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 01:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS 20 View Post
I looked through the book and couldn't find anything specific enough to cite on this.

However, I would say they're in the game and now considered players. My logic behind that is, let's say A6 goes and checks in for A1. A1 can't go out on the court after the TO is over b/c he/she was replaced and can't reenter until the clock has started. So I'd say you have to consider the subs players and the players who were replaced are now bench personnel.

I thought there was a case play on this, but I can't find it..per 4-34-1 a substitute does not become a player until either 1) they legally enter the court or 2) if entry is not legal, they are a player once the ball becomes live...since the sub in this case has not yet entered the court they can't be a player - therefore that would still make them bench personnel....that's my reasoning anyways
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 28, 2008, 01:20pm
Ch1town
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JS 20 View Post
I looked through the book and couldn't find anything specific enough to cite on this.

However, I would say they're in the game and now considered players. My logic behind that is, let's say A6 goes and checks in for A1. A1 can't go out on the court after the TO is over b/c he/she was replaced and can't reenter until the clock has started. So I'd say you have to consider the subs players and the players who were replaced are now bench personnel.
Oh really? I thought a player became bench personnel when the substitute entered the game unless the player was DQd, then the player becomes bench personnel when you tell the coach.

I also thought that during intermission, TOs all team members were considered bench personnel.

I could be wrong, surely someone will come along & let me know Maybe even JR...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bench personnel fullor30 Basketball 2 Mon Mar 03, 2008 09:55am
Bench Personnel? grunewar Basketball 12 Fri Jan 25, 2008 02:37pm
Bench Personnel? mj Basketball 7 Sun Jan 30, 2005 03:47pm
Bench Personnel question garote Basketball 7 Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:42pm
Bench personnel or not Nevadaref Basketball 5 Mon Feb 09, 2004 08:06am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1