|
|||
Bench Personnel?
During a timeout by Team A, A6, A7 and A8 report to the scorers table to check into the game and return to A's huddle. Team B breaks their huddle and takes the floor. As B1 is walking past A's huddle towards the throw-in spot, he taunts A1 and the two begin fighting. Eventually, B1, B2, B3 and A1, A2 and A6 fight.
Assess penalties. My biggest question is: how do officials determine who are players for A and who are bench personell? (A1-A8 can't all be considered players, can they?) |
|
|||
Quote:
See 3.3.1E |
|
|||
The subs had checked in and replaced the other players. The 5 players in the game (now A1 A2 A6 A7 A8) are not considered bench personnell during a timeout. If this happened during an intermission, all players are bench personell. You eject A1 and B1 immediately and then eject the other 4 for fighting. A6 is now a player and not considered bench personnel b/c this was during a timeout so no penalty on the HC.
Last edited by JS 20; Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 11:47am. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
sseltser said in his original post that they reported to check in and then returned to the huddle. He didn't mention them not doing so before the warning horn so I think it's safe to assume they checked in for A3 A4 A5 or A# whatever.
|
|
|||
But that's the point...you know they checked in, but not for whom they checked in. So, when A1 and A2 participate in the fight are they players or bench personnel?
If A7 checked in for A1, then A1 should be considered bench personnel for purposes of indirect technical fouls on the coach. The question being posed by the OP is how, or whether to try, to determine this. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
How should he be more specific? It's obvious what he's asking, why it matters, and what the challenge is.
I don't have a good answer for him, but it's an excellent question. |
|
|||
Ok now I get it.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Now that I think about it, you may very well be right, and that's going to make this situation a whole lot easier... |
|
|||
Quote:
However, I would say they're in the game and now considered players. My logic behind that is, let's say A6 goes and checks in for A1. A1 can't go out on the court after the TO is over b/c he/she was replaced and can't reenter until the clock has started. So I'd say you have to consider the subs players and the players who were replaced are now bench personnel. |
|
|||
Quote:
I thought there was a case play on this, but I can't find it..per 4-34-1 a substitute does not become a player until either 1) they legally enter the court or 2) if entry is not legal, they are a player once the ball becomes live...since the sub in this case has not yet entered the court they can't be a player - therefore that would still make them bench personnel....that's my reasoning anyways |
|
|||
Quote:
I also thought that during intermission, TOs all team members were considered bench personnel. I could be wrong, surely someone will come along & let me know Maybe even JR... |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bench personnel | fullor30 | Basketball | 2 | Mon Mar 03, 2008 09:55am |
Bench Personnel? | grunewar | Basketball | 12 | Fri Jan 25, 2008 02:37pm |
Bench Personnel? | mj | Basketball | 7 | Sun Jan 30, 2005 03:47pm |
Bench Personnel question | garote | Basketball | 7 | Wed Sep 22, 2004 12:42pm |
Bench personnel or not | Nevadaref | Basketball | 5 | Mon Feb 09, 2004 08:06am |