|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
NevadaRef: NFHS 2007-08 Rules Interpretation - Situation 10.
NevadaRef:
I answered you post in the NFHS Forum with regard to Situation 10. Any comments? MTD, Sr.
__________________
Mark T. DeNucci, Sr. Trumbull Co. (Warren, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Wood Co. (Bowling Green, Ohio) Bkb. Off. Assn. Ohio Assn. of Basketball Officials International Assn. of Approved Bkb. Officials Ohio High School Athletic Association Toledo, Ohio |
|
|||
That Interp has been discussed at length on this forum and roundly criticized as ridiculous and incorrect.
I didn't think that it needed a rehashing over on the NFHS site. Someone can post a link to one of the threads from last year for you. Obviously, I don't share your opinion that it is a proper ruling. |
|
|||
Quote:
99.99% of the officials in the world would not call a violation and would also be correct by rule in not doing so. The only people that would call that a violation is the clown who made that stoopid interpretation and any clown who also thinks that it's legal for a defender to move laterally under an airborne opponent after that opponent has left his feet. And I won't argue that ruling with any of those clowns either. It's a waste of time. Last edited by Jurassic Referee; Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 12:46am. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2007-08 Case Book 10.6.1 Situation A: | NoFear | Basketball | 10 | Thu Jun 26, 2008 07:00pm |
2007 NFHS Rules Changes - "Step and Reach" | Dakota | Softball | 8 | Mon Jul 10, 2006 02:46pm |
NFHS Interpretation #10 | Blue37 | Baseball | 3 | Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:15pm |
Situation - NFHS Rules | whiskers_ump | Softball | 5 | Tue Apr 12, 2005 07:40am |
Rule - Situation - Interpretation !!! | TheMentor | Basketball | 9 | Wed Oct 20, 2004 03:44am |