Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
NevadaRef:
I answered you post in the NFHS Forum with regard to Situation 10. Any comments?
MTD, Sr.
|
Yup. I'll give you the same comment here as I did over there......
99.99% of the officials in the world would not call a violation and would also be correct by rule in not doing so. The only people that would call that a violation is the clown who made that stoopid interpretation and any clown who also thinks that it's legal for a defender to move laterally under an airborne opponent after that opponent has left his feet.
And I won't argue that ruling with any of those clowns either. It's a waste of time.