Plays...

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Why wouldn't you want to let the players decide the game, instead of inserting your influence by ignoring what the players have done?

Agree completely.

Bottom line--you have 3 options:
1) call the foul.
2) ignore the foul and call the violation.
3) ignore the foul and also don't call the violation.

If you ignore the foul and call the violation, you just screwed the offensive team. If you ignore the foul and don't call the violation, you just screwed the defensive team. The only way that you don't screw anybody is to just call what happened.

[btaylor64]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Agree completely.

Bottom line--you have 3 options:
1) call the foul.
2) ignore the foul and call the violation.
3) ignore the foul and also don't call the violation.

If you ignore the foul and call the violation, you just screwed the offensive team. If you ignore the foul and don't call the violation, you just screwed the defensive team[/COLOR]. The only way that you don't screw anybody is to just call what happened.

So in your opinion what do you have? What does everybody have if both are getting screwed? Like I said its a B**CH OF A PLAY!

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by btaylor64

So in your opinion what do you have?

Exactly what I posted above.......

You call what happened. Yes, there was minimal contact. But that minimal contact forced a violation. It's the same as a defensive bump causing a player holding the ball to lose their balance and travel. The only call possible is a foul.