How good/bad is your association involved in politics?
Just want to ask you how good/bad is your association involved in politics. In my association, there is a good old boy system/group that takes over the board of directors and does not want to improve the association at all! :mad:
We only had five meetings last season and not even half the officials show up. They will not require mentors to help out the rookies. :( Too bad the next closest association is 200 miles away. |
Let me first say that I am not one who buys into the whole "politics" discussion that many officials like to have. I feel ultimately everyone has a system and if they work within that system they can benefit or parish. I honestly feel that most officials use any downfall as an excuse for their careers despite what is actually true.
Having said that that politics in my area exists, but it has little or nothing to do with the overall success of officials or who does what. There are all kinds of factors to how an official can succeed and the organizational structures where I live only play a small role in what an official can or cannot do. I guess I do not consider it bad or good. It is what it is. And at least where I live I have to please multiple people in order to work games which leads to other opportunities. None of this is in the hands of one or two people. Also you said that the association does not make mentors help out the rookies. I guess what I do not understand is how can anyone make someone help people if they do not want to? I know I found my own mentors and did not need an association structure to find people that I thought were helpful to me personally. I would agree that associations are there to help officials achieve a common goal, but that goal is not always to help everyone out in a structured way. In other words, if you get games from your association, that might be the main focus of the association. The multiple associations that I belong to main focus are training. So I get out of if what I decide to put into it. Peace |
I'm sure this isn't the case 100% of the time, but I think a good official will eventually make it hard for politics to hold him/her back. There just seems to always be a way for a good official to work games. I've seen politics all over the country and eventually good officials achieve some level of success. It might not always be what is desired, but it is success.
|
Quote:
My parish is Our Lady of the Holy Blarge:D |
The "good old boy" politics to which the OP refers is probably present at some level (big or small) in all officiating associations. In a group setting, it's almost impossible to remove politics from the equation.
However, I completely agree with the others who are right to say that (1) it won't hold back good officials who are truly intent on improving and (2) you can complain about it or deal with it. Locally, we have two basketball associations. The big one has 95% (or more) of the games and the small one gets the balance, but the small one also books for several NAIA colleges locally and has some top-caliber officials. I ultimately went with the smaller association, knowing I would get fewer varsity games but I also got intense "coaching/mentoring/harassing to improve" by the guys (and gals) in our group. For me, it was the right decision but I certainly don't knock anyone for choosing the larger association. Simply a matter of preference. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
How many meetings do you expect to have to go to for 1 association? |
Quote:
Is that a lot? |
Quote:
If so that is plain nuts. |
My, how parochial of you.
|
Quote:
Seems that a few of your fellow officials out there kinda disagree with your assessment. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Sure, I can see how that would make you think you\'re the best officials in the country. This stuff is easy in the classroom. |
Quote:
Used be 9 meetings/7 required. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22pm. |