|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Bonus points: Who cares? What are you trying to accomplish by singling these guys out? It's bad enough their names were mentioned in the article, so why rub salt into the wound? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
[QUOTE=ma_ref]I look at it as maybe it's some kind of weird coaching strategy - I don't like it when coaches try to ref...so as a ref, I'm not going to try to coach a team and determine what on earth they're trying to accomplish. You want a timeout? You got it.
QUOTE] I agree, especially in the NCAA-M's game. They may be actually trying to buy a timeout, especially when they get the ball back, unlike the women and Fed. |
|
|||
Would this be the camp to get a look see for Big Sky:
http://www.stripezone.com/sz/marlaDenham08.asp |
|
|||
Quote:
1.) You are working the first game of the year in your town's local 6-year old league. During a dead ball, Coach A says "Billy, you sub into the game for Johnny!" Billy jumps up and down, smiles at his grandparents who are in the first row of the bleachers, and runs straight out onto the floor without being beckoned. 2.) You are working a middle school basketball game. The home team has on gold jerseys that were worn by the high school varsity team 8 years ago. 3.) You are working your state's high school championship game. It is a tie game with 20 seconds remaining. A1 dribbles into a trap and is facing an enormous amount of defensive pressure. Coach A comes up the sideline to where you are trail officiating the play yelling "TIME OUT! TIME OUT!" As you glance to make sure the coach is requesting a time out, you notice he is two feet past the line of his coaching box. |
|
|||
Quote:
That's the whole point. There was one second to go, be patient, make sure you saw what happened, and by then, time is expired and you don't have to worry about it. If there were 5 or 10 seconds remaining, you would probably have to handle it differently. |
|
|||
Quote:
In the OP, it is still not entirely clear to me the L saw and ignored the request. It is not stated that way in the article, but it is mentioned as the OP's "understanding" of what happened. We do know, though, that the NCAA does not want a excess TO request to be ignored. We also know that what got the officials in trouble was not going to the monitor in this situation, to see if the request and therefore the T, was before the horn sounded.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
M&M- we aren't disagreeing... none of those plays have to do with the original post. I was just irritated at JAR's needle of "what other things will you ignore?" I'm not talking about other situations- I am talking about THIS situation. If he wants to call a technical foul in all 3 of the situations I talked about, then he can be critical of those of us who see shades of gray situationally in the games we work.
Regarding the situation in the OP, I stand by my original statement. 1.) If there had been NO whistle as time expired, there would be no issues. 2.) If there had been a whistle, they had gone to the monitor to check the clock, and assessed a technical foul, there would be no issues. By blowing a whistle, and then NOT going to the monitor to check the clock, there were major issues. I would be fine with anyone who chose option 1 or option 2. |
|
|||
Quote:
In the OP the "R" said that he knew that the T/O was @ the horn or after the horn & decides to ignore it and go OT. The fact that the "R" decided to rule this way doesn't remove the "U's" from the liability of kicking the rule. One of the "U's" should have spoken up, if they didn't, and tell the "R" that they have to go to the monitor to see if there should be any time on the clock when the T/O was granted with the whistle. Now if the "R" says that he's not and he knows that there wasn't then in the leagues I work we are instructed to make a statement to the "R" along the lines of, "I want to go on record by saying that I don't agree with this ruling and that I think it should be such & such." The supervisor will be conversing with all 3 officials about the play. If that happens then the official that went on record with the other 2 probably would be excused from kicking the rule. I have never had to give that statement since if one of us is giving information and says that they are sure their information is correct then why wouldn't the "R" accept it and react/rule appropriately? It leaves me to surmise that in the OP that the "U's" probably didn't give the information that they should be going to the monitor. Which would be why they all 3 got the game suspension.
__________________
It is what it is!! |
|
|||
Quote:
Obviously, top notch officials though. I agree TRef no reason not to go to the monitor in this case just to be sure. Last edited by biz; Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:05pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Sky suspends three officials for error | Nevadaref | Basketball | 13 | Wed Mar 01, 2006 05:12pm |
Men's Final Four Officials | kenref1 | Basketball | 0 | Mon Apr 05, 2004 08:41pm |
Any CIS men's officials?? | ref18 | Basketball | 9 | Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:55pm |
Men's Final 4 Officials? | Zebra1 | Basketball | 1 | Thu Apr 10, 2003 02:12am |
Men's Final Four Officials | johnSandlin | Basketball | 3 | Sun Apr 01, 2001 07:02am |