|
M&M- we aren't disagreeing... none of those plays have to do with the original post. I was just irritated at JAR's needle of "what other things will you ignore?" I'm not talking about other situations- I am talking about THIS situation. If he wants to call a technical foul in all 3 of the situations I talked about, then he can be critical of those of us who see shades of gray situationally in the games we work.
Regarding the situation in the OP, I stand by my original statement.
1.) If there had been NO whistle as time expired, there would be no issues.
2.) If there had been a whistle, they had gone to the monitor to check the clock, and assessed a technical foul, there would be no issues.
By blowing a whistle, and then NOT going to the monitor to check the clock, there were major issues.
I would be fine with anyone who chose option 1 or option 2.
|