T or no T

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Daryl H. Long

But to be honest, I can not say I would do it. There is clearly nothing so egregious that what they did should receive the same penalty as the player who does so in anger. Prevent it from happening.

It's called selective blindness, Rev. Jmo, but I think that most good officials have a touch of it.

[truerookie]

This remains of a situation I observed when I was on vacation in Hawaii over the holiday break. I went to watch a few holdiay tournaments. A player got called for a foul it was his fifth. So, in disgust the player pulls his jersey out of his shorts immediately following the call. No call! He did not stop there he continued to remove his jersey completely. No call!!

[secondregionbug]

The spirit of the rule is what I belive is to stop a behavior problem, I did not T the kids up for this act but my partner came across the court and did after I gave them a delay of game warning. I felt bad but a rule is a rule...............

[blindzebra]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

It's called selective blindness, Rev. Jmo, but I think that most good officials have a touch of it.

So we do pick and choose what T's to give or ignore then, huh?

Seems a far cry from just enforce the rule it doesn't matter the circumstances.

[secondregionbug]

Lets vote..... To T or not to T, that is the Question....... My vote NO!