![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
I think you are reading a little too much into what I said. I clearly am saying that just because you do not see the screen, if there is contact the responsibility of the contact is on the defender (or screened player) and just because they did not see the screen. If the defender has several steps, then they can be called for a foul. The only way you would consider the contact incidental if the defender tries to stop or get around the defender. And just because they do not see the screen does not make them exempt from being called for a foul. Also looking at the NCAA rules under 4-59, I do not see this reference. Maybe your reference is in one of the guideline sections, but I am not seeing that at this time. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 02:57pm. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Screening | L W Holmes | Basketball | 12 | Wed Dec 12, 2007 08:23pm |
Screening | jdoldn07 | Volleyball | 4 | Mon Sep 25, 2006 12:53pm |
Screening the defender | Chess Ref | Basketball | 20 | Tue Mar 07, 2006 02:00pm |
screening | kalr | Basketball | 7 | Wed Nov 19, 2003 08:02am |
Overlapping and Screening | BktBallRef | Volleyball | 3 | Fri Aug 10, 2001 11:40am |