The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 486
Can you be TOO crisp in your mechanics?

Went to a G-JV/V double header last night...took my girls to watch as part of youth rec league night...Of course I ended up observing the officials more than watching the game itself

Varsity crew was, 3-whistle...The R looked to be about 23 years old...kid had a baby face. I was thinking "Man, he's young for a V official"....

I was sitting 3 rows behind the score table and the gym was bare (imagine that!)....Tried to focus in on his pre-game with the table and coaches and watched his floor position and reporting manners.

Now I'm not saying anything bad about this guy, I don't know him, have never seen him officiate before and he and the crew called a really good game (there was only one call I thought should have been whistled a block on a major crash and pass that was no call and the defender got her head slammed into the floor...) but as I watched this particular guy's mechanics, he seemed VERY tight.

I know you want to be crisp and clean with your mechanics but I thought while he was always in control and focused...he appeared to be overly tight almost to the point that it was awkward and uncomfortable looking....almost robotic in nature.

For instance...on his 5 & 10 sec counts...his hand was in the position and as rigid as a one in the service that would salute an officer....and he chopped the count almost above his shoulder at ear level. Perhaps this is preferred(at least by him)...I tend to be below the shoulder about mid chest. Maybe I'm wrong?

When reporting...it was the same thing....arm would come up to signal the number to the table and it was head high to the side....(rest of his crew and where I typically report is chest high and in front of me).

Again, I'm not bad mouthing the kid...I just thought he appeared to be tight and it almost looked like he was not having fun...I wanted to tell him to loosen up and have fun...

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:20am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Battle Creek, MI
Posts: 383
I think that it is great the he is starting with proper or maybe perfect mechanics. But I also belive that you can make them your own, with out distorting them, so they have more of a flow and less mechanical.

If they are too mechanical they do not look natural and that is less credible.

Last edited by Scooby; Wed Dec 19, 2007 at 09:56am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:24am
Huck Finn
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,347
If your mechanics are in front of you, it could be hard for the table to see. If they are high and to the side they will be easier to see. The same thing with numbers. What would you rather have 5, 0 dollars or 50 dollars? If your answer is 50 then that should be the way you report.
Back on point, it would be hard for someone to give a definitive response without seeing this official.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
I have been to a few 3 crew camps where we were instructed to make the visible count "at least shoulder level or above" and the "hand was to flex from a closed (fingers together) to open (fingers apart) position. This was really harped on. I used to give count with arm starting about chest high and angling downward but since the camps now try and keep it shoulder high but I would never go higher - it's too uncomfortable.

When reporting to table I try and keep hand off shoulder/away from in front of my chest so that it is easier to see.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 477
I ask in all seriousness, did he have his arms bent and arms out in front (like rock-em sock-em robots)? I ask because I went to a college camp this past summer, and there was this young kid there (not saying same kid, actually kid was from Mississippi), he was so robotic looking, almost exactly what you described and he held his arms in the above manner. Anyways, the clinicians, who are the cream-of-the-crop in women's basketball said he looked to robotic and described him as looking "silly". When I see young officials officiate like this, I try to tell them to relax and look more relaxed.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 03:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeTheRef
I ask in all seriousness, did he have his arms bent and arms out in front (like rock-em sock-em robots)? I ask because I went to a college camp this past summer, and there was this young kid there (not saying same kid, actually kid was from Mississippi), he was so robotic looking, almost exactly what you described and he held his arms in the above manner. Anyways, the clinicians, who are the cream-of-the-crop in women's basketball said he looked to robotic and described him as looking "silly". When I see young officials officiate like this, I try to tell them to relax and look more relaxed.
Joe...pretty much...I really thought his calls and that of his partners were fine but Rock-em-Sock-em robot or toy soldier would describe him pretty well.

Even when he would point to the spot for throw in, rather than use one or two fingers it was wrist cocked, thumb tucked in the "salute" form, palm up...almost the "gimme five" position....very rigid and he would hold it there until his partner got to the spot...almost as if he couldn't release it until he was there.

I've just not see an official appear this way...most guys I work with and watch seem loose. I feel bad discussing it, like I'm talking bad about him...this crew did a fine job...that was evident by the lack of barking by the coaches AND fans...they were almost transparent if you will...
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 10:02am
mj mj is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
I have been to a few 3 crew camps where we were instructed to make the visible count "at least shoulder level or above" and the "hand was to flex from a closed (fingers together) to open (fingers apart) position. This was really harped on. I used to give count with arm starting about chest high and angling downward but since the camps now try and keep it shoulder high but I would never go higher - it's too uncomfortable.

When reporting to table I try and keep hand off shoulder/away from in front of my chest so that it is easier to see.

Were they using women's mechanics at these camps? The only place I see visible counts that high is college women's officials.

Back to the original question, it is my opinion that it's possible to be too crisp in your mechanics. Better to be smooth than robotic.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 124
Can you be too sharp in your mechanics? yes.

__________________
Are there rocks ahead? If there are, we all be dead!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 10:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
No that was the odd part. It mens and a short section (30 min)with NFHS mechanics
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby
I think that it is great the he is tarting with proper or maybe perfect mechanics. But I also belive that you can make them your own, with out distorting them, so they have more of a flow and less mechanical.

If they are too mechanical they do not look natural and that is less credible.

"it is great the he is tarting "

Let's hope he doesn't trollop.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltdoggs
that was no call and the defender got her head slammed into the floor...) but as I watched this particular guy's mechanics, he seemed VERY tight.

I know you want to be crisp and clean with your mechanics but I thought while he was always in control and focused...he appeared to be overly tight almost to the point that it was awkward and uncomfortable looking....almost robotic in nature.

Thoughts?
We had a guy here who was about two months out of the military when he started. He looked like a tin soldier! Took a year or two to tone it down a little.!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 10:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 45
...The R looked to be about 23 years old...kid had a baby face. I was thinking "Man, he's young for a V official"....

..The sharp mechanics are probably why he's doing varsity...
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 19, 2007, 11:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 359
I was told at camp this past year that I was too mechanical, and it looked robotic. The evaluator told me that my mechanics were too precise and that I needed to make them more my own, "show my personality" were his exact words. My response was "thank you," and I made the change. It is an interesting take though, because in all my previous years at camps, I have never had an evaluator tell me I was too mechanical. Hmmmm . . .
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 20, 2007, 01:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: washington
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by texaspaul
...The R looked to be about 23 years old...kid had a baby face. I was thinking "Man, he's young for a V official"....

..The sharp mechanics are probably why he's doing varsity...

You are exactly right, for that is how it goes in our area, it will be his ability to comunicate that will keep him there and beyound
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 10:28pm
ace ace is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 530
Send a message via AIM to ace
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltdoggs
I was thinking "Man, he's young for a V official"....
obviously someone thought he was capable to be working the game. I don't understand some of the older guys can't think just because we're young we can't referee.

my mechanics aren't as tight as they should be, but I'm working on it. I think I've gotten to where I've gotten because of my game and my mechanics.
__________________
John "acee" A.
Recently got a DWI - Driving With Icee.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA Mechanics, NFHS Rules/Mechanics InvisibleRef Basketball 4 Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:06am
3-MAN mechanics deecee Basketball 17 Wed May 31, 2006 01:17pm
3-man mechanics blueump Baseball 6 Thu May 04, 2006 03:14pm
3 on 3 mechanics Junker Basketball 11 Tue May 02, 2006 08:32am
3-man Mechanics mpeterson_1 Baseball 11 Tue Aug 06, 2002 04:34pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1