![]() |
Is the official correct?
Just for a little fun and for some of the new posters/officials. Yeah - I'm bored.
NFHS Rules 1. Team B is beating Team A by 60 points. Before the start of the 4th quarter, Team B's and Team A's coach tell the Referee they both agree to shorten the 4th quarter to 2 minutes. The Referee tells the coaches that the quarter can't be shortened. Is the official correct? 2. B1 is in their frontcourt. B1's pivot is his/her left foot. B1 lifts his/her pivot foot before passing to B2. The official calls a traveling violation. Is the official correct? 3. B3 is shooting two free throws. B pulls their players from their two lane spots for both shots. The official allows the players from A to move down and occupy each of B's lane spots (Team A has their maximum of 4 players in the lane). Is the official correct? 4. Team B has 6 team fouls. During a throw-in by B, B3 commits a foul on A4. Official calls a team control foul on B and gives the ball to A at the spot nearest to the foul for a throw-in. Is the official correct? 5. Team A has 7 fouls. A1 fouls B3. After directing some comments toward the official, A1 is charged with a technical foul. The official let's B3 shoot his/her 1 and 1 with the lane cleared. The official then let's B5 (who was in the game at the time of the technical) shoot one of the technical foul free throws and then allows B8 (who was on the bench at the time of the technical) to enter the game and shot the second technical foul free throw. Team B is then given a throw-in opposite table at the division line. Is the official correct? (Hopefully I didn't make any little errors...but I'm sure if I did JR, Bob, Mark, Tony, Jim, or Santa will let me know. :) Heck if I make a really dumb error, I might even pull Chuck out of the wood work.) Edit 1: Silly errors corrected |
Quote:
In number five are you going to allow a member of the offending team, A8, shoot the remaining free throw? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm also curious as to why in question two, you specified that the player was in front court. Does it matter to the question? No. Also, in question three, if the official allows team A to take both of team B's lane spots and team A still occupies their own spots, it would mean that team A has six players. Actually, if you read it closely, you have one team A player occupying two spots at the same time on opposite sides of the lane. That must be one big kid!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In #3, yes, I can see where that was misleading. Hopefully my correction has fixed the problem. Thanks Mark. |
OK I'm gonna play. Let's see if the old brain is working. I'll imitate Nevada by giving the reules references for some of them.
1. Nope. They can mutually agree anytime and if the coach down by 60 wants to keep playing call an ambulance and get him in a psych unit. 5-5-3 2. No travel. Pivot foot is in the air on the pass. 4-43-B 3. Yep - they can move down if team A doesn't want them.(Because I said so:) 4. Nope, No team control on a throw in. 4-12-6 5. Yep, Violations are penalized inthe order in whichthey occured. No rule dictates the same shooter has to shoot both throws. (Because I said so.) ----------------- So, Tanner, how did I do? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
2. 4-44-3a; 4.44.3 Sit C 3. 8-1-4e 4. :) 5. These are fouls, not violations. ;) Yes, they are administered in order per 8-7, but you misspelled "occurred." :D A specific NFHS interp says the two throwers may be different. (2003-04 Sit 13, reference given is 8-3) |
Not nuances... typos:D .
|
Quote:
|
I give up. What is it?
|
Quote:
75. Playing time for a varsity game may be reduced by mutual agreement of the opposing coaches. Is your answer true or false? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22am. |