Question... Do we go to the arrow?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Had the missed FT try struck the ring or had the try been for FG during normal play, then the miss would not constitute a violation and there would be no obvious POI.

Really? It seems to me that the miss *is* the obvious POI and 4-POI-3 (or whatever the specific reference is -- I'm away from my books) applies.

IOW, it's a misnomer to say "sometimes you go to the POI and sometimes you go to the arrow." What's correct is "you always use the POI and sometimes the POI is the arrow." (the above on a double foul, etc.)