|
|||
After #3
Ok, so Saturday night some buddies and I got together and looked up everything on the test. Our big discussion was as to what happens following the situation.
During an alternating-possession throw-in by A1, B2 intentionally kicks the throw-in pass. A1 will be awarded a new throw in opportunity, but the arrow will remain pointed in the direction of A's basket. We referenced 4-42-5 but different on the interpretation on what happens next. Is the arrow changed once the ensuing throw in has been completed, ie legally touched in bounds, does the arrow change at that point. We differed on how the editorial change was interpreted and haven't been to a state meeting yet. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
I had the same question
my best guess was that it was meant to be a throw in based on the violation and therefore the AP arrow would not be affected by the subsequent throw-in; I have to say I am not sure what the logic is behind that approach, but it seems to be what they are getting at; hopefully someone will come along with an actual cite for us
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
that case play does address the situation and it again sounds very much like a violation throw in and not an AP throw in for the second throw, but it certainly would be nicer if had clarified, still I think that it is trying to say that the second throw will not be an AP-throw and the arrow will not change
thanks for the cite |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by KSRef07; Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 06:52pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
Other posters have already referred you above to the proper rules citation. It's on page 3 of this year's rule book.....case play 4.42.5. Don't you bother checking out the rules citations when they're given? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
It's so obvious about 40% will miss it on the test. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|