After #3

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by KSRef07

If all the others posters are correct and it is obvious we only need one post - right?

To rephrase it slightly, it is obvious that we only need one right post. Unfortunately, your post wasn't the one that was right.

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

To rephrase it slightly, it is obvious that we only need one right post. Unfortunately, your post wasn't the one that was right.

We can't all be perfect.

[Junker]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

Jeff, the consensus here is that the arrow will not change. Since the AP throwin is never completed, the arrow will stay with A until the next AP situation. The 2nd throwin is for the violation, not the AP.

One of the guys doing the test with me talked it over with our main assignor at a rules meeting last night. This is the correct interpretation. Nicely done Adam.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by KSRef07

We can't all be perfect.

Speak for yourself.

[stmaryrams]

Originally Posted by boiseball

my best guess was that it was meant to be a throw in based on the violation and therefore the AP arrow would not be affected by the subsequent throw-in; I have to say I am not sure what the logic is behind that approach, but it seems to be what they are getting at; hopefully someone will come along with an actual cite for us

This was how it was addressed at our state rules meeting. The ball was not legally touched therefore the AP arrow does not change. The ball is awarded based on the violation.