Ncaa Poe

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

No, you still completely fail to understand very basic rules and concepts. The ball is dead immediately after a made basket EVERY time it happens at ANY time during the game. You're confusing stopping the clock with the ball becoming dead. Still. It's been explained to you...oh...maybe 20-30 times since you came here. It's like talking to a wall.

Dude, I wasn't born yesterday. The ball maybe dead but the clock is still running! Okay, if the clock is still running, I can still have a personal foul. For example: after a made bucket b4 grabs A4 trying to get free. Okay, using the block/charge reasoning we are discussing here, I am to let that foul go if it's not intentional or flagrant. Give me a break! Somebody please shut this fool up, he ruining the discussing. I'm trying to learn and you're playing grade school games.

B4 fouling A4 is a personal foul. If before all this, A1 drives in and shoots, and the ball goes in, and then there's contact to B1 standing under the basket. You're telling me we're ignoring this because it's not intentional? No wonder it's so damn inconsistent! I never reason this. I reason you can't play defense standing under the basket like it was last year with the women. Oh brother.....where are all the decent referee's?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Old School

Dude, I wasn't born yesterday. The ball maybe dead but the clock is still running! Okay, if the clock is still running, I can still have a personal foul. For example: after a made bucket b4 grabs A4 trying to get free. Okay, using the block/charge reasoning we are discussing here, I am to let that foul go if it's not intentional or flagrant. Give me a break! Somebody please shut this fool up, he ruining the discussing. I'm trying to learn and you're playing grade school games.

What would you say if someone told you that he is right and that you are the fool?

4-19-1 NOTE: Contact after the ball has become dead is ignored unless it is ruled intentional or flagrant or is committed by or on an airborne shooter.


6.1.2 SITUATION B: Team A has just scored a goal. The ball is bouncing close to the end line when: (a) A1 calls for a time-out; or (b) A1 contacts B1. RULING: In order to rule correctly, it depends on whether the bouncing ball is judged to be at the thrower's disposal. If the covering official judges it is at the thrower's disposal, he/she would start the count and the ball becomes live. In this case, in (a) no time-out is granted and the foul in (b) is penalized. If the ball is not at the thrower's disposal, the time-out is granted in (a) and the contact in (b) is ignored unless it is intentional or flagrant. COMMENT: In this situation, the covering official must give the new throw-in team a moment or two to recognize it is their ball for a throw-in and get a player into the area to pick up the ball. If the ball is near the end line, it is the throw-in team's responsibility to secure it and throw-in from anywhere out of bounds along the end line. The covering official shall start his/her throw-in count when it is determined the ball is available. (4-4-7d)

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Old School

Dude, I wasn't born yesterday. The ball maybe dead but the clock is still running! Okay, if the clock is still running, I can still have a personal foul. For example: after a made bucket b4 grabs A4 trying to get free. Okay, using the block/charge reasoning we are discussing here, I am to let that foul go if it's not intentional or flagrant. Give me a break!

That's what the rules say. If you have to call this foul when the ball is dead, you have to call an intentional (or flagrant, if appropriate) technical foul. Ignore the contact if you can.

Originally Posted by Old School

Where are all the decent referee's? (sic)

Reading, understanding, and following the rules as written rather than as they'd like to see them written.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

1) Dude, I wasn't born yesterday. The ball maybe dead but the clock is still running! Okay, if the clock is still running, I can still have a personal foul. For example: after a made bucket b4 grabs A4 trying to get free. Okay, using the block/charge reasoning we are discussing here, I am to let that foul go if it's not intentional or flagrant.

2) Somebody please shut this fool up, he ruining the discussing.

1) How does your theory work in the last minute of an NCAA game when the ball is dead after a made basket and the clock isn't running? Your birth date doesn't matter. Your lack of basic rules knowledge does matter.

2) deleted.

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

1) How does your theory work in the last minute of an NCAA game when the ball is dead after a made basket and the clock isn't running? Your birth date doesn't matter. Your lack of basic rules knowledge does matter.

2) deleted.

I don't know what my birth date is got to do with this. I know that my rules knowledge is not as good as yours. However, the difference between me and you is that, if I was on top of my profession. I would not hate others for not being on top of there's. IOW's, I wouldn't feel threaten by someone like me who's trying to learn his way. I wouldn't engage in constant insults nor try to get others to feel the same way about me, iow's spread hate. Now I know why decent thinking referee's don't frequent this forum.

A wise man once said, true leaders understand you don't have to put people down to make a point. These type of leaders are respected thru-out history, the ladder are not.

Last, I have absolutely no respect for people who try to make others look bad at their expense. To me, you are truly the scum of the earth. Where does it end.....?

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Old School

I don't know what my birth date is got to do with this. I know that my rules knowledge is not as good as yours. However, the difference between me and you is that, if I was on top of my profession. I would not hate others for not being on top of there's. IOW's, I wouldn't feel threaten by someone like me who's trying to learn his way. I wouldn't engage in constant insults nor try to get others to feel the same way about me, iow's spread hate. Now I know why decent thinking referee's don't frequent this forum.

A wise man once said, true leaders understand you don't have to put people down to make a point. These type of leaders are respected thru-out history, the ladder are not.

Last, I have absolutely no respect for people who try to make others look bad at their expense. To me, you are truly the scum of the earth. Where does it end.....?

When you first started posting, most of us tried to help -- giving respectful, accurate answers. You, however, have shown no inclination or ability to learn, and continue to spout incorrect rules under the guidance of "opinion."

If you don't have any respect for us, you should leave. Seriously.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Old School

To me, you are truly the scum of the earth. Where does it end.....?

Exactly, where does it end?

[Jimgolf]

Originally Posted by Old School

IOW's, I wouldn't feel threaten by someone like me who's trying to learn his way.

You learn by listening, not by talking. Ask questions, if you want to guess at an answer to someone else's question, say upfront "My guess is ...", then ask, "Am I right?" or the like.

When you are told you are wrong, don't argue, try to listen harder.

Order the rule books, case books, and videos from NFHS, officiate more games with good partners, and LISTEN!

A smart man knows his limitations. Only a fool ignores them.

Shhhh!

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Jimgolf

You learn by listening, not by talking. Ask questions, if you want to guess at an answer to someone else's question, say upfront "My guess is ...", then ask, "Am I right?" or the like.

When you are told you are wrong, don't argue, try to listen harder.

Order the rule books, case books, and videos from NFHS, officiate more games with good partners, and LISTEN!

A smart man knows his limitations. Only a fool ignores them.

Shhhh!

You are a wise man, Jim.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

You are a wise man, Jim.

Ah, that's who VI's been quoting all this time.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

Ah, that's who VI's been quoting all this time.

Nope, but it should have been. I keep telling him he needs to fire his wise man, now we know whom he should hire.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Old School

Dude, I wasn't born yesterday. The ball maybe dead but the clock is still running! Okay, if the clock is still running, I can still have a personal foul. For example: after a made bucket b4 grabs A4 trying to get free. Okay, using the block/charge reasoning we are discussing here, I am to let that foul go if it's not intentional or flagrant. Give me a break! Somebody please shut this fool up, he ruining the discussing. I'm trying to learn and you're playing grade school games.

1) Okay -- STFU.

2) We've told you before the difference between "dead ball" and "clock running". Are you even trying to learn?

3) Please stop the name calling. I can't moderate others when you engage (and start) the poor behavior.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Please stop the name calling. I can't moderate others when you engage (and start) the poor behavior.

I went back and deleted my response. No longer applicable or needed. My apologies.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

1) Okay -- STFU.

ROFLMAO!!!

2) Are you even trying to learn?

NO!!! I hate to be an "I told you so" kind of person, but NO, he's not here to learn or contribute. I've said this repeatedly. His sole purpose here is to get so far under your skin that the moderator of the forum drops an F-bomb. He's getting his jollies. He needs to get the boot, and permanently this time.

3) I can't moderate others when you engage (and start) the poor behavior.

Does that mean I can call him a moron and it won't get deleted this time?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

NO!!! I hate to be an "I told you so" kind of person, but NO, he's not here to learn or contribute. I've said this repeatedly. His sole purpose here is to get so far under your skin that the moderator of the forum drops an F-bomb. He's getting his jollies. He needs to get the boot, and permanently this time.

I second this motion. He's not even the plucky comic relief. He's just a nuisance, and a very prolific one. He's like that jerk kid down the street who thinks it's cool to spraypaint grafitti on everybody's fence. He gets his jollies watching everybody else working to clean up his mess. And he just comes out the next night to deface the place again. Boot him. All the way. Forever!